A benefit-sharing model for hydropower projects based on stakeholder input-output analysis: A case study of the Xiluodu Project in China

A benefit-sharing model for hydropower projects based on stakeholder input-output analysis: A... The rich hydro resources and global pressures of greenhouse gas emission have promoted the rapid development of hydropower projects in China. However, the benefit distribution unfairness in hydropower projects leads to problems such as resettlement conflicts, which significantly hinder the sustainable development of hydro resources. In order to determine a reasonable benefit sharing policy system, this study employs a new perspective, which treats the reservoir migrants as a formal project stakeholder rather than the passive “compensation receivers” previous practices have considered them to be. From this perspective, this study 1) identifies the stakeholders of hydropower projects and their input/output factors based on stakeholder theories, and highlights the four most important core stakeholders, i.e., government, hydropower generation enterprises, reservoir migrants, and power grid enterprises; 2) designs a specific calculation method for the four core project stakeholders’ cash flows and establishes a quantitative benefit-sharing model based on the input-output analysis; and 3) employs the Xiluodu Project in China as a case study to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Theoretically, the change in reservoir migrants’ status in the project delivery framework provides a new perspective for benefit sharing and resettlement studies. Practically, this study establishes a feasible quantitative tool for the description and assessment of benefit sharing systems, and the overall assessment of hydropower projects. The results of the case study show that, under the current benefit distribution policy of China, yields of reservoir migrants are significantly lower than those of other core stakeholders. The results also indicate that, by increasing resettlement compensation standards and slightly adjusting the electricity generation price, all core stakeholders’ yields can reach a more rational and fair level. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Land Use Policy Elsevier

A benefit-sharing model for hydropower projects based on stakeholder input-output analysis: A case study of the Xiluodu Project in China

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/a-benefit-sharing-model-for-hydropower-projects-based-on-stakeholder-07Kyxm9AG1
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0264-8377
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.002
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The rich hydro resources and global pressures of greenhouse gas emission have promoted the rapid development of hydropower projects in China. However, the benefit distribution unfairness in hydropower projects leads to problems such as resettlement conflicts, which significantly hinder the sustainable development of hydro resources. In order to determine a reasonable benefit sharing policy system, this study employs a new perspective, which treats the reservoir migrants as a formal project stakeholder rather than the passive “compensation receivers” previous practices have considered them to be. From this perspective, this study 1) identifies the stakeholders of hydropower projects and their input/output factors based on stakeholder theories, and highlights the four most important core stakeholders, i.e., government, hydropower generation enterprises, reservoir migrants, and power grid enterprises; 2) designs a specific calculation method for the four core project stakeholders’ cash flows and establishes a quantitative benefit-sharing model based on the input-output analysis; and 3) employs the Xiluodu Project in China as a case study to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Theoretically, the change in reservoir migrants’ status in the project delivery framework provides a new perspective for benefit sharing and resettlement studies. Practically, this study establishes a feasible quantitative tool for the description and assessment of benefit sharing systems, and the overall assessment of hydropower projects. The results of the case study show that, under the current benefit distribution policy of China, yields of reservoir migrants are significantly lower than those of other core stakeholders. The results also indicate that, by increasing resettlement compensation standards and slightly adjusting the electricity generation price, all core stakeholders’ yields can reach a more rational and fair level.

Journal

Land Use PolicyElsevier

Published: Apr 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial