Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Work of Treason in the Age of User-Generated Content Revolution

The Work of Treason in the Age of User-Generated Content Revolution <jats:p>Gil Anidjar's essay reflects upon the occurrence of revolution in the context of user-generated content: as a self-promulgating and, purportedly, instantly consumable spectacle of power. Anidjar discusses the ‘seeming collapse’ of the temporal distance between the event and its narrative, its actor and its spectator, its survivor and its witness. Drawing on the valuation of spectatorship, in Immanuel Kant's insights on the French revolution, as embodying the significance of the event itself, and invoking the inherent element of ‘danger’ Kant perceived in the act of public utterance of judgment on the event, Anidjar suggests that such judgment may only, in Kantian terms, be responsibly pronounced in the immediate wake of the event as a manifestation of ‘treason’. To seek to endow the revolutionary effort with the urgency of fame will be a necessarily premature gesture, and the shortening of the distance between the event and its judgment an impossible exercise, Anidjar argues, since ‘we have not been granted the power to decide, much less to know whether, by our actions or reactions, we are betraying ourselves or our people or state, or whether we might be bringing about the faithful redemption of that which that people or that state of ours should already have been.’</jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png CounterText Edinburgh University Press

The Work of Treason in the Age of User-Generated Content Revolution

Anidjar, Gil
CounterText , Volume 1 (1): 98 – Apr 1, 2015
Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/edinburgh-university-press/the-work-of-treason-in-the-age-of-user-generated-content-revolution-eX94YWjeZC

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Copyright
© Edinburgh University Press 2015
Subject
Literary Studies
ISSN
2056-4406
eISSN
2056-4414
DOI
10.3366/count.2015.0009
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p>Gil Anidjar's essay reflects upon the occurrence of revolution in the context of user-generated content: as a self-promulgating and, purportedly, instantly consumable spectacle of power. Anidjar discusses the ‘seeming collapse’ of the temporal distance between the event and its narrative, its actor and its spectator, its survivor and its witness. Drawing on the valuation of spectatorship, in Immanuel Kant's insights on the French revolution, as embodying the significance of the event itself, and invoking the inherent element of ‘danger’ Kant perceived in the act of public utterance of judgment on the event, Anidjar suggests that such judgment may only, in Kantian terms, be responsibly pronounced in the immediate wake of the event as a manifestation of ‘treason’. To seek to endow the revolutionary effort with the urgency of fame will be a necessarily premature gesture, and the shortening of the distance between the event and its judgment an impossible exercise, Anidjar argues, since ‘we have not been granted the power to decide, much less to know whether, by our actions or reactions, we are betraying ourselves or our people or state, or whether we might be bringing about the faithful redemption of that which that people or that state of ours should already have been.’</jats:p>

Journal

CounterText – Edinburgh University Press

Published: Apr 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.