Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The resurgence of the aesthetic

The resurgence of the aesthetic Comparative Critical Studies 1, 1–2, pp. 1–15 © BCLA 2004 CHAPTER TWO After a short and checkered history, aesthetics is unquestionably enjoying an unexpected resuscitation. Having been given its first systematic exposition by Baumgarten in the middle of the eighteenth century, it quickly embarked on an impressive career, suffering just occasional setbacks when downgraded to pure semblance, or equated with the vacuity of a self-indulgent aestheticism; none of these disparagements however, affected its prominence as a philosophy of art throughout the nineteenth century. Aesthetics was ranked equal to metaphysics, and was sometimes even elevated to the capstone of the prevalent philosophical systems. Its downturn occurred in the twentieth century, when it was denounced as a flight from reality, a self-centered quietism, an idle disengagement, a deceitful illusion, and a narcissistic hedonism – in other words, when it was identified with attitudes. It is therefore all the more surprising that aesthetics now appears to be center stage again. The nature of aesthetics, however, has changed over time, and in order to understand its resurgence, we must first go back into its history. Baumgarten defined aesthetics (1735), as ‘the science of how things are to be cognized by the senses’,1 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Comparative Critical Studies Edinburgh University Press

The resurgence of the aesthetic

Comparative Critical Studies , Volume 1 (1-2): 1 – Jun 1, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/edinburgh-university-press/the-resurgence-of-the-aesthetic-xo17ftJ05i

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Copyright
© Edingburgh Universery Press
ISSN
1744-1854
eISSN
1750-0109
DOI
10.3366/ccs.2004.1.1-2.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Comparative Critical Studies 1, 1–2, pp. 1–15 © BCLA 2004 CHAPTER TWO After a short and checkered history, aesthetics is unquestionably enjoying an unexpected resuscitation. Having been given its first systematic exposition by Baumgarten in the middle of the eighteenth century, it quickly embarked on an impressive career, suffering just occasional setbacks when downgraded to pure semblance, or equated with the vacuity of a self-indulgent aestheticism; none of these disparagements however, affected its prominence as a philosophy of art throughout the nineteenth century. Aesthetics was ranked equal to metaphysics, and was sometimes even elevated to the capstone of the prevalent philosophical systems. Its downturn occurred in the twentieth century, when it was denounced as a flight from reality, a self-centered quietism, an idle disengagement, a deceitful illusion, and a narcissistic hedonism – in other words, when it was identified with attitudes. It is therefore all the more surprising that aesthetics now appears to be center stage again. The nature of aesthetics, however, has changed over time, and in order to understand its resurgence, we must first go back into its history. Baumgarten defined aesthetics (1735), as ‘the science of how things are to be cognized by the senses’,1

Journal

Comparative Critical StudiesEdinburgh University Press

Published: Jun 1, 2004

There are no references for this article.