Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Eric Sandberg The body never stays buried. If a field of cultural production as diverse and multifaceted as crime fiction could be said to have a single, over-arching principle, this might well be it. In the narratives of mystery, detection, transgression, and punishment of all sorts that constitute the broad literary field of the genre, the past is frequently a tangible presence. It may be temporarily forgotten, it may have been swept with all the energy of desperation under the carpet of the passing years, it may seem to have lost its grip and sway upon the present, but, almost inevitably, it returns. And accompanied all too often by the putridity of decay – metaphorical, actual, or both. This presence of the past (often in very unpleasant forms) is perhaps clearest in the variant of the crime narrative sometimes described as the mystery, at other times as the classic detective story or the whudunnit. As Carl D. Malmgren points out, the ‘double-plot structure’ of this type of crime writing (most influentially discussed by Tzvetan Todorov in his essay ‘The Typology of Detective Fiction’) offers at least a partial explanation of the subgenre’s ‘orientation towards the past’: the crime, the
Crime Fiction Studies – Edinburgh University Press
Published: Sep 1, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.