Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Victoria Madden and Harriet Stilley ‘[You] are the Mount Rushmore of murder, […] the definition of American success. They write books about you. Make movies of your life. Years after your death people continue to be enthralled. You’ve made your mark in history. Like the Iliad, your stories will live forever.’ –‘Devil’s Night,’ American Horror Story: Hotel (2015) ‘Just about every American can identify Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer.’ – Julie B. Wiest, Creating Cultural Monsters: Serial Murder in America (124) ‘Everybody’s fascinated with the notion that there is a cause and effect,’ claims notorious serial killer Ted Bundy, quoted in the Netflix original series, Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (2019) – that we can ‘put our finger on it,’ and reassuringly rationalise the genesis of the uniquely modern phenomenon of the American serial killer. But when there is ‘absolutely nothing’ in the background of a serial murderer that would lead one to believe they were ‘capable of committing murder,’ how do we begin to acclimatise ourselves to this violent defect of contemporary history? More challengingly, how do we bring depth to our collective portrait of what constitutes a murderer, so that we may then self-exempt
Crime Fiction Studies – Edinburgh University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.