Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Cinematic ârealityâ is a construct which is open to many interpretations, so long as we take the movies for what they are, namely a ï¬ction, and documentaries for what they are, namely a random trace of reality from the viewpoint of the ï¬lmmaker. But as soon as we begin to mistake an image for reality, or the mask of another reality, also visible, and we reach conclusions on everythingâs relativism, including that of all viewpoints, we distort the relationship with truth and, in the ï¬nal analysis, with science. In this article, discusses how different layers of meaning can be embedded into the way such reality is read through image and sound. The intersection of science and cinema does not seem to have produced any noteworthy results for either discipline, despite the fact that movies were in large part inspired by scientiï¬c investigations, in particular the study of animal and human movement, such as the ï¬ight of birds. KEYWORDS ï¬lm sound language dialogue voiceover 1. The original article in French is appended below. The New Soundtrack 2.1 (2012): 23â38 DOI: 10.3366/sound.2012.0025 # Edinburgh University Press www.eupjournals.com/SOUND 2. See his fascinating and still pertinent article, âMontage interditâ, in ´ Quâest-ce
The New Soundtrack – Edinburgh University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.