Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Andrew Keanie , Hartley Coleridge: A Reassessment of His Life and Work (New York and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 196. £40.00 hardback. 978140397472.

Andrew Keanie , Hartley Coleridge: A Reassessment of His Life and Work (New York and Hampshire:... Reviews Geoffroy, some very interesting questions are asked, which throw new light on the novel. Some essays are rather more leftfield in their claims than others, not that this is necessarily a problem. Victor Frankenstein is diagnosed as a ‘manic personality’ by Jane Goodall, who also attempts, as do other authors, to nuance the over-simplified understanding of Shelley as ‘anti-Promethean.’ Many of the essays contradict each other in their readings of the novel and of Shelley’s message, but perhaps that is no bad thing either, given that the novel has become a hugely popular text on degree-level English courses because of the many possibilities for its interpretation. Many of the contributions tell us things that we already know, and greater editorial influence over the whole would have helped to avoid the repetition that occurs, as well as the often simplistic accounts of very well-known men of science from the times. Many essays choose one scientific writer, experimenter, text, or topic (and the choice sometimes seems quite random) and these essays do not talk to each other. Some degree of consistency over such subjects as Mary Shelley’s reading of or knowledge of Erasmus Darwin, which are mentioned in a http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Romanticism Edinburgh University Press

Andrew Keanie , Hartley Coleridge: A Reassessment of His Life and Work (New York and Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 196. £40.00 hardback. 978140397472.

Romanticism , Volume 15 (3): 289 – Oct 1, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/edinburgh-university-press/andrew-keanie-hartley-coleridge-a-reassessment-of-his-life-and-work-aXXfL4Jd5k

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Copyright
© Edinburgh University Press 2009
Subject
Reviews; Literary Studies
ISSN
1354-991X
eISSN
1750-0192
DOI
10.3366/E1354991X09000816
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Reviews Geoffroy, some very interesting questions are asked, which throw new light on the novel. Some essays are rather more leftfield in their claims than others, not that this is necessarily a problem. Victor Frankenstein is diagnosed as a ‘manic personality’ by Jane Goodall, who also attempts, as do other authors, to nuance the over-simplified understanding of Shelley as ‘anti-Promethean.’ Many of the essays contradict each other in their readings of the novel and of Shelley’s message, but perhaps that is no bad thing either, given that the novel has become a hugely popular text on degree-level English courses because of the many possibilities for its interpretation. Many of the contributions tell us things that we already know, and greater editorial influence over the whole would have helped to avoid the repetition that occurs, as well as the often simplistic accounts of very well-known men of science from the times. Many essays choose one scientific writer, experimenter, text, or topic (and the choice sometimes seems quite random) and these essays do not talk to each other. Some degree of consistency over such subjects as Mary Shelley’s reading of or knowledge of Erasmus Darwin, which are mentioned in a

Journal

RomanticismEdinburgh University Press

Published: Oct 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.