Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Hulst, N. Smith (1985)
Advances in nonlinear phonology
J. Packard (2000)
The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach
R. Chaves (2008)
Linearization-based word-part ellipsisLinguistics and Philosophy, 31
D. Bolinger (1967)
Adjectives in English: Attribution and predicationLingua, 18
M. Saito, T. Lin, Keiko Murasugi (2008)
N'-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and JapaneseJournal of East Asian Linguistics, 17
Waltraud Paul (2005)
Adjectival modification in Mandarin Chinese and related issues, 43
Shi-Zhe Huang (2006)
Property Theory, Adjectives, and Modification in ChineseJournal of East Asian Linguistics, 15
Rodnry Huddleston, Geqffrry Pullum (2002)
The Cambridge Grammar of the English LanguageZeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 53
Gregory Ward, R. Sproat, G. McKoon (1991)
A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islandsLanguage, 67
(1977)
Transformations and the lexicon
G. Cinque, L. Rizzi (2009)
The Cartography of Syntactic Structures
Waltraud Paul (2010)
Adjectives in Mandarin Chinese: The rehabilitation of a much ostracized category
R. Sproat, Chilin Shih (1991)
The Cross-Linguistic Distribution of Adjective Ordering Restrictions
G. Scott (2002)
Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of the nominal phrases
E. Selkirk (1982)
The syntax of words
(1991)
574) argue that adjectives that cannot occur as predicatives cannot occur with de ‘SUB
G. Cinque (2002)
Functional structure in DP and IP
L. Sadler, D. Arnold (1994)
Prenominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinctionJournal of Linguistics, 30
M. Hüning, A. Onysko, Sascha Michel (2010)
Adjective + Noun constructions between syntax and word formation in Dutch and German
G. Booij (1985)
Coordination Reduction in Complex Words : A Case for Prosodic Phonology
<jats:p>Mandarin Chinese has three A+N constructions with distinct formal properties. One construction is clearly phrasal, one clearly constitutes a compound. The status of the third construction is controversial, being analysed either as a compound or as a phrase. Frequently drawing on data from Germanic A+N constructions for comparison, I show in this article that this issue is undecidable on the basis of the Mandarin data. On the other hand, I argue that the third construction cannot be collapsed with either of the other two constructions, regardless of whether it is analysed as a compound or a phrase.</jats:p>
Word Structure – Edinburgh University Press
Published: Oct 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.