“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

Try 2 weeks free now


Ecological theory suggests that community structure determines how ecosystems respond to perturbation. However, this idea is not well-tested empirically, in part because it is difficult to define the appropriate reference state for evaluating post-perturbation dynamics in field experiments. In this study, we (1) evaluated two different methods of determining the reference state, and (2) tested hypotheses derived from theory and previous experiments about the effects of herbivore community structure on autotroph responses to nutrient pulses in freshwater plankton communities. We hypothesized that (1) phytoplankton are less sensitive to a nutrient pulse with increasing zooplankton biomass, size, and Daphnia abundance, and (2) phytoplankton recover more quickly from the nutrient pulse with increased zooplankton biomass and increased abundance of taxa with rapid numerical responses, especially small-bodied cladocerans. We tested these hypotheses in field mesocosm experiments, which crossed four zooplankton community structures with two nutrient pulse treatments in a fully randomized factorial design. We found that phytoplankton sensitivity decreased with increased zooplankton biomass, size, and Daphnia biomass regardless of the method used to define the reference state, supporting our first hypothesis and suggesting that results for sensitivity are robust to methodology. This result, together with previous work, clearly demonstrates that zooplankton have a strong effect on phytoplankton sensitivity. Further, as predicted, return times were shorter with increased zooplankton biomass and biomass of small cladocerans. However, contrary to expectations, return times also declined with Daphnia and copepod biomass, suggesting that the effects of zooplankton on return time are more complex than we hypothesized. Moreover, conclusions for return time depended somewhat on methodology, indicating that we may need to reevaluate whether the concept of return time is relevant for field experiments. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecology Ecological Society of America

Loading next page...

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy unlimited access and
personalized recommendations from
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $40/month

Try 2 weeks free now

Explore the DeepDyve Library

How DeepDyve Works

Spend time researching, not time worrying you’re buying articles that might not be useful.

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Simple and Affordable Pricing

14-day free trial. Cancel anytime, with a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches


Best Deal — 25% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 25% off!
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

billed annually