Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Do predators control prey species abundance? An experimental test with brown treesnakes on Guam

Do predators control prey species abundance? An experimental test with brown treesnakes on Guam The effect of predators on the abundance of prey species is a topic of ongoing debate in ecology; the effect of snake predators on their prey has been less debated, as there exists a general consensus that snakes do not negatively influence the abundance of their prey. However, this viewpoint has not been adequately tested. We quantified the effect of brown treesnake ( Boiga irregularis ) predation on the abundance and size of lizards on Guam by contrasting lizards in two 1-ha treatment plots of secondary forest from which snakes had been removed and excluded vs. two 1-ha control plots in which snakes were monitored but not removed or excluded. We removed resident snakes from the treatment plots with snake traps and hand capture, and snake immigration into these plots was precluded by electrified snake barriers. Lizards were sampled in all plots quarterly for a year following snake elimination in the treatment plots. Following the completion of this experiment, we used total removal sampling to census lizards on a 100-m 2 subsample of each plot. Results of systematic lizard population monitoring before and after snake removal suggest that the abundance of the skink, Carlia ailanpalai , increased substantially and the abundance of two species of gekkonids, Lepidodactylus lugubris and Hemidactylus frenatus , also increased on snake-free plots. No treatment effect was observed for the skink Emoia caeruleocauda . Mean snout–vent length of all lizard species only increased following snake removal in the treatment plots. The general increase in prey density and mean size was unexpected in light of the literature consensus that snakes do not control the abundance of their prey species. Our findings show that, at least where alternate predators are lacking, snakes may indeed affect prey populations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecology Ecological Society of America

Do predators control prey species abundance? An experimental test with brown treesnakes on Guam

Download PDF
34 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ecological-society-of-america/do-predators-control-prey-species-abundance-an-experimental-test-with-TNj9jLHO2y

References (45)

Publisher
Ecological Society of America
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Ecological Society of America
Subject
Articles
ISSN
0012-9658
DOI
10.1890/11-1359.1
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The effect of predators on the abundance of prey species is a topic of ongoing debate in ecology; the effect of snake predators on their prey has been less debated, as there exists a general consensus that snakes do not negatively influence the abundance of their prey. However, this viewpoint has not been adequately tested. We quantified the effect of brown treesnake ( Boiga irregularis ) predation on the abundance and size of lizards on Guam by contrasting lizards in two 1-ha treatment plots of secondary forest from which snakes had been removed and excluded vs. two 1-ha control plots in which snakes were monitored but not removed or excluded. We removed resident snakes from the treatment plots with snake traps and hand capture, and snake immigration into these plots was precluded by electrified snake barriers. Lizards were sampled in all plots quarterly for a year following snake elimination in the treatment plots. Following the completion of this experiment, we used total removal sampling to census lizards on a 100-m 2 subsample of each plot. Results of systematic lizard population monitoring before and after snake removal suggest that the abundance of the skink, Carlia ailanpalai , increased substantially and the abundance of two species of gekkonids, Lepidodactylus lugubris and Hemidactylus frenatus , also increased on snake-free plots. No treatment effect was observed for the skink Emoia caeruleocauda . Mean snout–vent length of all lizard species only increased following snake removal in the treatment plots. The general increase in prey density and mean size was unexpected in light of the literature consensus that snakes do not control the abundance of their prey species. Our findings show that, at least where alternate predators are lacking, snakes may indeed affect prey populations.

Journal

Ecology – Ecological Society of America

Published: May 1, 2012

Keywords: Key words : abundance ; Bayesian model selection ; binomial mixture model ; Boiga irregularis ; Carlia ailanpalai ; Emoia caeruleocauda ; geckos ; Hemidactylus frenatus ; Lepidodactylus lugubris ; predation ; removal experiment ; skinks .

There are no references for this article.