Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
September 2003 19 The title character of Christopher Marlowe’s intriguing drama Tamburlaine Part I (c. 1587) has a problem. Suffering from an overwhelming anxiety about his ignoble background, Tamburlaine is concerned both with proving the rightfulness of his claims to various thrones and with forcefully changing the minds of his opponents who dismiss him as nothing but an upstart shepherd. What he lacks, then, is confidence in the le gitimacy of his actions. By exercising the gift of persuasive speech throughout the play, Tamburlaine attempts to obfuscate the reality that what he is doing is not right. But he needs some help in justifying his violent course of action. The most logical approach to solving this problem of creat ing legitimacy is to marry someone in the desired socio-economic position, so that what Tamburlaine says more convincingly re sembles the truth. The answer to his dilemma is Zenocrate, sole heiress to Egypt, and thus an economically viable asset, power fully connected to a political and social establishment to which Tamburlaine has no other legitimate access. The purpose of this essay is to displace traditional characterizations of Zenocrate as merely a pretty face whose female guile charms Tamburlaine off the
English Language Notes – Duke University Press
Published: Sep 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.