Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Pearce, A. Spiro, P. Ebrey (2001)
Culture and Power in the Reconstitution of the Chinese Realm, 200–600
S. Pollock (2006)
The Language of the Gods in the World of Men: Sanskrit, Culture, and Power in Premodern India
Michael Puett (2002)
The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China
Stephen Owen (1996)
Readings in Chinese Literary Thought
Antje Richter (2015)
A History of Chinese Letters and Epistolary Culture
K. Chang, Stephen Owen (2013)
The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature
S. Pollock (2005)
Literary Cultures in History: Reconstructions from South AsiaWorld Literature Today, 79
Paul Rouzer (2001)
Articulated Ladies: Gender and the Male Community in Early Chinese Texts
Alexander Beecroft (2015)
An Ecology of World Literature: From Antiquity to the Present Day
V. Mair (2002)
The Columbia History of Chinese Literature
Stephen Owen (2006)
The Making of Early Chinese Classical Poetry
M. Kern, Robert Hegel (2004)
A History of Chinese Literature, 26
Yigal Bronner, D. Shulman, Gary Tubb (2014)
Innovations and turning points : toward a history of kāvya literature
• • Anna M. Shields The Shock of the Old Kitabkhana 1 49 THE SHOCK OF THE OLD kāvya works” is not intended to be a comprehen- Locating Innovation in Ancient Traditions sive literary history (26), the volume is arranged chronologically and produces, in the end, coher- Anna M. Shields ently linked snapshots in a literary historical nar- rative, if one with gaps and silences. Interestingly, Yigal Bronner, David Dean Shulman, and Gary A. Tubb’s Innovations and Turning Points: Toward a His- this choice to focus on the granularity of the tradi- tory of Kāvya Literature aims to disturb some long- tion may make it more, not less open to readers from other fields, in part because of the contrib - established views on Sanskrit literature — namely, that it became over the course of its long history utors’ sensitivity to the difficulty of the task, sig - naled by that preposition “toward” in the title. As “monolithic, self- replicating, and ultimately ster- ile.” To an outsider to the Sanskrit tradition like a literary historian, I see three scholarly moves in myself, a specialist in Chinese literature of the cen- the volume that suggest some fruitful comparative conversation with
Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East – Duke University Press
Published: May 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.