Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

QUIETISM FROM THE SIDE OF HAPPINESS: Tolstoy, Schopenhauer, War and Peace

QUIETISM FROM THE SIDE OF HAPPINESS: Tolstoy, Schopenhauer, War and Peace Tolstoy writes in a letter to his friend A. A. Fet that what he has written in War and Peace , "especially in the epilogue," is also said by Schopenhauer in The World as Will and Representation . Tolstoy adds, however, that Schopenhauer approaches "it from the other side." Schopenhauer does indeed say much the same thing as Tolstoy says in his epilogue and elsewhere about history and the will. Each of these authors argues that history is not progressing and that it is not governed by the actions of individual political or military leaders alone, but by the infinitely many actions of the multitude of people. What underlies this critique of history in each case is a quietist outlook on life, a perspective from which one must abandon the assertion of the will and accept life as it is given. Tolstoy's quietism, however, is a happy quietism ; he wants his reader to joyfully embrace life for all that it has to offer. Schopenhauer's is an unhappy quietism ; he wants his reader to accept life in the face of all that it is not. Thus, Tolstoy and Schopenhauer approach quietism, and consequently their critiques of history and the will, from different "sides." These sides—to borrow Wittgenstein's way of speaking—are the sides of the happy and the unhappy. To approach quietism from one side rather than another is no small matter. In Tolstoy's case in particular, it made all the difference in the world. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Common Knowledge Duke University Press

QUIETISM FROM THE SIDE OF HAPPINESS: Tolstoy, Schopenhauer, War and Peace

Thompson, Caleb
Common Knowledge , Volume 15 (3) – Oct 1, 2009
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/duke-university-press/quietism-from-the-side-of-happiness-tolstoy-schopenhauer-war-and-peace-oQCo1hg0xw
Publisher
Duke University Press
Copyright
Duke University Press
ISSN
0961-754X
eISSN
1538-4578
DOI
10.1215/0961754X-2009-020
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Tolstoy writes in a letter to his friend A. A. Fet that what he has written in War and Peace , "especially in the epilogue," is also said by Schopenhauer in The World as Will and Representation . Tolstoy adds, however, that Schopenhauer approaches "it from the other side." Schopenhauer does indeed say much the same thing as Tolstoy says in his epilogue and elsewhere about history and the will. Each of these authors argues that history is not progressing and that it is not governed by the actions of individual political or military leaders alone, but by the infinitely many actions of the multitude of people. What underlies this critique of history in each case is a quietist outlook on life, a perspective from which one must abandon the assertion of the will and accept life as it is given. Tolstoy's quietism, however, is a happy quietism ; he wants his reader to joyfully embrace life for all that it has to offer. Schopenhauer's is an unhappy quietism ; he wants his reader to accept life in the face of all that it is not. Thus, Tolstoy and Schopenhauer approach quietism, and consequently their critiques of history and the will, from different "sides." These sides—to borrow Wittgenstein's way of speaking—are the sides of the happy and the unhappy. To approach quietism from one side rather than another is no small matter. In Tolstoy's case in particular, it made all the difference in the world.

Journal

Common Knowledge – Duke University Press

Published: Oct 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.