Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
COMPARATIVE LITERATURE / 280 learn through dialogue with, or testimony from, the victims of the Holocaust? How is the trauma and testimony of these victims comparable to that of the victims of more recent examples of extreme political violence? Can an understanding of the horrors of Nazism and the experiences of the victims help us arrive at an authentic and profoundly human intersubjectivity? And whether in the form of ï¬ction, poetry, or memoir, how does one write about such an event? Moreover, what is the role of the reader or critic, who can be seen to act as a kind of interlocutor or âco-witnessâ to the victims and witnesses of these texts? What moral and ethical parameters and limitations should govern critical responses to such texts? These are just some of the difï¬cult and complex questions raised in the four works under review. The ï¬rst two books deal primarily with âtestimonyâ in the broadest sense and the role of the witness and critic. The last two deal most centrally with the ethical philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Stevan Weineâs Testimony after Catastrophe: Narrating the Traumas of Political Violence and Michael G. Levineâs The Belated Witness: Literature, Testimony, and the
Comparative Literature – Duke University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.