Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Introduction: Intermedial Aesthetics: Korean Literature , Film , and Ar t Theodore Hughes and Jina Kim Why do we encounter the current emphasis on transnational and interdisciplina ry work? The transnational and the interdisciplina ry are often invoked in the same breadth, but what is the relations hip between them? Both imply a reframing of scholarship in the name of crossing, moving across borders that have fo reclosed an awareness of connections, combinations, intertextual/visual/au ral relations that cannot be bounded off by the posi ting of cultural or geopoli tical "areas." Suc h crossings resemble the movemen ts of the intermedial, which, in our view, can se rve to place the transnational and the interdisciplina ry in a close r, consti tu tive relations hip with each other. Leena Eili ttii summa rizes Irina Rajewsky's defini tion of "intermedial coexistence" as follows: Media combination points to those works of art which benefit from two or three more forms of art, such as opera, film or the photo novel. Media change highligh ts works of art that transform one form of art into another, such as takes place in the filming of literature. The third form of intermediality draws attention
Journal of Korean Studies – Duke University Press
Published: Sep 15, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.