Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Xiaofei Tian (2016)
Remaking History: The Shu and Wu Perspectives in the Three Kingdoms PeriodJournal of the American Oriental Society, 136
(2006)
“Cong Jin shu kan Tang dai de Shishuo xinyu jieshou” 從《晉書》看唐代的《世說新語》接受
(2015)
661–721). Shi tong 史通 (A Comprehensive Study of Historiography). Annotated by Pu Qilong 浦起龍 (1679–1762)
(1992)
Shishuo xinyu yanjiu 世說新語研究 (Research on Shishuo xinyu)
(1991)
沈家本與《古書目四種》 (Shen Jiaben and “Four Ancient Booklists”). Guji zhengli yanjiu qikan 古籍整理研究期刊 (Research and Collation of Ancient Texts
(1983)
余嘉錫, ed. Shishuo xinyu jianshu 世說新語箋疏 (Shishuo xinyu, with Annotations)
R. So, Hoyt Long (2013)
Network Analysis and the Sociology of Modernismboundary 2, 40
Shih-hsiang Chen (1953)
An Innovation in Chinese Biographical WritingThe Far Eastern Quarterly, 13
M. Bastian, Sebastien Heymann, Mathieu Jacomy (2009)
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating NetworksProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
(1982)
Zhongguo gudai de leishu 中國古代的類書
G. Sanders (2014)
A New Note on Shishuo xinyuEarly Medieval China, 2014
J. Farmer (2007)
The Talent of Shu: Qiao Zhou and the Intellectual World of Early Medieval Sichuan
(2007)
“Sanguozhi Pei Songzhi zhu yin shu kao” 三國志裴松之注引書考
(1991)
“Shen Jiaben yu Gu shumu si zhong” 沈家本與《古書目四種》
Jack Chen, Zoe Borovsky, Yoh Kawano, Ryan Chen (2014)
The Shishuo xinyu as Data VisualizationEarly Medieval China, 2014
(2014)
Liuchao zazhuan yanjiu 漢魏六朝雜傳研究 (Research on “Miscellaneous Accounts” of the Han,Wei, and Six Dynasties)
Matthew Wells (2015)
From Spirited Youth to Loyal Official: Life Writing and Didacticism in the Jin shu Biography of Wang DaoEarly Medieval China, 2015
H. Small (1978)
Cited Documents as Concept SymbolsSocial Studies of Science, 8
(2009)
Shen Jiaben Shishuo zhu suo yin shu mu yanjiu
(2014)
Nianer shi kaoyi 廿二史考異 (Examination of Discrepancies in the Twenty-Two Histories)
W. Hung, 燕京大学図書館引得編纂處 (1966)
Index to Shih shuo hsin yü and to the titles quoted in the commentary = 世説新語引得 : 附劉注引書引得
(2000)
shixue de sixiang yu shehui jichu 魏晉史學的思想與社會基礎 (Wei-Jin Historiographic Thought and Its Social Foundation)
R. Cutter, R. Mather (1977)
Shih-shuo hsin-yü : a new account of tales of the worldHarvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 37
(2012)
Sisun Weilüe jiaozhu 高似孫緯略校注 (Gao Sisun’s Weilüe, Edited and Annotated)
A. Booth (2017)
Mid-Range Reading: Not a ManifestoPMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 132
During the Liu-Song 劉宋 dynasty (420–79), Pei Songzhi 裴松之 (372–451) compiled an elaborate set of annotations to the history of the Three Kingdoms era, Sanguozhi 三國志. Several decades later, during the Liang 梁 dynasty (502–57), Liu Xiaobiao 劉孝標 (462–521) compiled similar annotations for Shishuo xinyu 世說新語, a collection of pithy anecdotes concerning prominent figures from the Han through Jin dynasties. These annotations were products of a new era of textual production, in which fervent interest in historiography and book collecting reached new heights. Though building on earlier traditions of commentary and exegesis, the influence of this newly expanded network of textual circulation can be seen in the sheer variety of sources Pei and Liu cite, as well as in their meticulous and unprecedented attention to bibliographic detail. This has made it possible to use their annotations to trace the compilers and titles of hundreds of texts that would otherwise be completely unknown. Relying on this wealth of information, earlier studies have tabulated the titles of all cited sources to create lengthy bibliographies. But in doing so, they divorce this bibliographic information from the context in which it was originally embedded. This study uses data mined from these annotations to create a series of network diagrams, which illustrate how citations of older texts create connections among the various chapters of the two texts to which they were appended. By considering the networks of textual relationships created through annotation, this study reveals the importance of otherwise marginalized texts in the construction of historiographic knowledge and sheds new light on how scholars of the early medieval period made use of, and made sense of, the increasingly vast sea of text to which they had access.
Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture – Duke University Press
Published: Nov 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.