Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Blessed are the peacemakers. Gretchen Horlacher's illuminating study of Stravinskian form and texture, the product of two decades' research and reflection, is a quietly persuasive, stimulating, and, above all, constructive contributiontoafieldofinquirythathasseenmorethanitsshareofsquawking.Themanyexclamationpointswithwhichshesomewhatoverseasonsher otherwisegracefulprosearemorewhimsicalthanhortatory.Theyconveyan airofdelighteddiscoverythatreaderswillshare. Thetitlegivesaforetasteofthebook'spremiseandeventualachievement.Blocks,toaStravinskian,aretheformalconstituentsthat,inthewellknown words of Pieter van den Toorn, maintain a high degree of "consistency,identityanddistinction,"aswellas"insulation"fromoneanother,so that Igor Stravinsky's music appears to proceed not through the smoothly continuousanddynamicdevelopmentalprocessesthatgiveunifiedshapeto earliermusic,butinsteadthroughthejuxtapositionoralternationofhypostatizedunitsthatarehighlycontrastiveinsuccessionandthataccomplishthe shapingprocessthroughsheerinertialaccumulationofdisunifiedanddiscontinuous elements, producing a paradoxical impression of continuity by discontinuity.1 Horlacher's complaint is that earlier writers have tended to exaggeratethesehabits,contentingthemselveswithadescriptionofStravinskianformthatapproachesrandomness,whereasacloserlookrevealsafar moreinterestingandstrategicpracticewherebytheapparentlystaticrepetitionsofandwithinblocksactuallysetandachievegoals,andthejuxtapositionsbetweenthemarecalculatedtorealizedynamicgrowth.Inshort,the blocksbuild. Ishouldhavesaid"contentingourselves"intheforegoingparagraph, becauseIamoneofthosenamedalongwithvandenToornashavingunder1 For the phrase "consistency, identity and distinction," seevandenToorn1983,xv;headds"insulation"at339 whendiscussingtheSymphonies of Wind Instruments. Journal of Music Theory 56:2,Fall2012 DOI10.1215/00222909-1650424 ©2012byYaleUniversity estimated Stravinsky's formal strategies. (Others are named as well, but as Horlacher'sindeximmediatelydiscloses,vandenToornandIarethewriters towhoseworksheisatgreatestpainstooffersupplementsandcorrectives.)I havebeenperhapsevenmoreinsistentthanvandenToornoncharacterizing Stravinsky'smusicasstaticanddiscontinuous,becauseIhavedonesowithin anoverarchingargumentthatStravinsky'smusicisthewayitisbecauseitis theworkofarussiancomposer.Thisraisesspectersofexoticismandessentialism, which my notorious(even, according to Stephen Walsh, "sadistic") russian-derived technical vocabulary reinforces by identifying the static aspects of Stravinsky's music with the russian word nepodvizhnost' (literally "immobility") and the discontinuousness with the word drobnost' (literally "fragmentedness").2athirdrussianterm,uproshcheniye,whichmeans"simplification,"completestheimpressionthatStravinsky'smusicisdeficientin qualitiesthatnormallyconnotequalityinacademicmusicstudy.Horlacher, blessheragain,isunafraidoftheterms,seestheirpoint,andhelpfullyglosses them(althoughshemistakenlyinfersthattheyoriginatedinthediscourse offolklorestudies).nevertheless,itisnotsurprisingthatshewouldwantto countertheirpotentiallydisreputableimplications. ratherthanstaticaccumulation,Horlacherproposesthatweidentify Stravinsky'sformalprocessas"orderedsuccession,"forwhichshehasdevised averyeffectivemeansofgraphicrepresentation(reminiscentofedwardT. cone'sfamousdiagramoftheSymphonies of Wind Instruments,whichevidently inspiredit)inwhichsimilarelementsarealignedvertically,sothattheirconstituentunitscanbecomparedwithgreatestease,and(inparticular)sothat theirsubtledifferencesarerenderedasconspicuousaspossible(1962,158 59).Inaseriesoffivechapters,startingwithoneonthefirstoftheThree Pieces for String Quartet,probablyStravinsky'smostthoroughlyostinato-drivenpiece, andending--inevitably--withoneontheSymphonies,whichhasalwaysbeen theprimeexhibitforconnoisseursofdrobnost' andthesubjectofcelebrated analysesbycone,lászlóSomfai,JonathanKramer,christopherHasty,and others,HorlacherpainstakinglyandpersuasivelydemonstrateshowStravinsky's"meticulousprocessoffleshingoutapiecesuggeststhatthecomposer wasacutelyawareoftheorderinwhichitsreiterationsoccur,"andconcerned withmakingthatorderaseffectiveaspossible(x). Thisisanadmirablymodestwayofstakingherclaim,andallthemore compellingforthat.Becausesheisconcernedtodemonstratenotonlythat themusiciseffectivebutalsothatthecomposer'sprocessofshapingitimplied definitecriteriaofeffectiveness,shemakesfrequentandprofitablereference toStravinsky'ssketches.(Ihaveoftenvoicedskepticismabouttherelevance of sketch studies to analysis or evaluation, to the point where I
Journal of Music Theory – Duke University Press
Published: Sep 21, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.