Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
1 Although this account has been pronounced unverifiable by more recent scholarship on the painting with regard to its details (for example, the door on the right), it is still accepted as a ANAMORPHIC REALISM/295 Except for the anamorphic stain in the middle, The Ambassadors is a straightforwardly representational painting.2 In the stain we are confronted with an unreadable element that disturbs our vision of what appears to be reality. Here, in Stephen Greenblattâs words, âdeath is affirmed not in its power to destroy the flesh . . . , but in its uncanny inaccessibility and absence.â Greenblatt goes on: âWhat is unseen or perceived as only a blur is far more disquieting than what may be faced boldly and directly, particularly when the limitations of vision are grasped as structural, the consequence more of the nature of perception than of the timidity of the perceiverâ (19). The need to know arises as a consequence of this disjunction and tension between linear and anamorphic perspectives, between apparent representational plenitude and a blatant flaw within it.3 The viewer of The Ambassadors is encoded into the logic of the painting as a protagonist to whom something happens in time. In
Comparative Literature – Duke University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.