Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1981)
mate aim of biodiversity conservation, which is the persistence of valued biodiversity
Pressey Pressey, Nicholls Nicholls (1989)
Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring vs. iterative procedures.Biological Conservation, 50
Soulé Soulé, Sanjayan Sanjayan (1998)
Conservation targets: do they help?Science, 279
M. Araújo, Paul Williams (2000)
Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence dataBiological Conservation, 96
M. Soulé, M. Sanjayan (1998)
ECOLOGY: Conservation Targets: Do They Help?Science, 279
E. Finkel (1998)
Software Helps Australia Manage Forest DebateScience, 281
R. Channell, Mark Lomolino (2000)
Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered speciesNature, 403
W. Hagemeijer, M. Blair (1997)
The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds
T. Blackburn, K. Gaston, R. Quinn, R. Gregory (1999)
Do local abundances of British birds change with proximity to range edge?Journal of Biogeography, 26
R. Pressey, A. Nicholls (1989)
Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approachesBiological Conservation, 50
P. Nantel, A. Bouchard, L. Brouillet, S. Hay (1998)
Selection of areas for protecting rare plants with integration of land use conflicts: A case study for the west coast of Newfoundland, CanadaBiological Conservation, 84
R. Lincoln, G. Boxshall, P. Clark (1982)
A dictionary of ecology, evolution, and systematics
A. Mitchell-Jones, G. Amori, W. Bogdanowicz, B. Kryštufek, P. Reijnders, F. Spitzenberger, M. Stubbe, J. Thissen, V. Vohralík, J. Zima (1999)
The Atlas of European Mammals
Williams Williams, Humphries Humphries, Araújo Araújo, Lampinen Lampinen, Hagemeijer Hagemeijer, Gasc Gasc, Mitchell‐Jones Mitchell‐Jones (2000)
Endemism and important areas for conserving European biodiversity: a preliminary exploration of atlas data for plants and terrestrial vertebrates.Belgian Journal of Entomology, 2
F. Szalay (2000)
The Atlas of European Mammals. A. J. Mitchell-Jones , G. Amori , W. Bogdanowicz , B. Kryštufek , P. J. H. Reijnders , F. Spitzenberger , M. Stubbe , J. B. M. Thissen , V. Vohralik , J. ZimaThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 75
R. Pressey, V. Logan (1998)
Size of selection units for future reserves and its influence on actual vs targeted representation of features: a case study in western New South WalesBiological Conservation, 85
C. Margules, A. Nicholls, R. Pressey (1988)
Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversityBiological Conservation, 43
Williams Williams, Araújo Araújo (2000)
Using probabilities of persistence to identify important areas for conservation.Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 267
A. Nicholls, C. Margules (1993)
An upgraded reserve selection algorithmBiological Conservation, 64
(1987)
The demography of chance extinction. Pages 11– 34 in M. E. Soulé, editor. Viable populations for conservation
(1994)
Regional overview : Europe
M. Burgman, S. Ferson, H. Akçakaya (1993)
Risk assessment in conservation biology
Mark Lomolino, R. Channell (1995)
Splendid Isolation: Patterns of Geographic Range Collapse in Endangered MammalsJournal of Mammalogy, 76
D. Simberloff, E. Rapoport, Barbara Drausal (1983)
Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species
C. Wolf, B. Griffith, C. Reed, S. Temple (1996)
Avian and Mammalian Translocations: Update and Reanalysis of 1987 Survey DataConservation Biology, 10
P. Williams, Helen Klerk, T. Crowe (1999)
Interpreting biogeographical boundaries among Afrotropical birds: spatial patterns in richness gradients and species replacementJournal of Biogeography, 26
W. Kunin (1998)
Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scalesScience, 281 5382
A. Kiester, J. Scott, B. Csuti, Reed Noss, Bart Butterfield, K. Sahr, D. White (1996)
Conservation Prioritization Using GAP DataConservation Biology, 10
J. Turpie (1995)
Prioritizing South African estuaries for conservation: A practical example using waterbirdsBiological Conservation, 74
John Curnutt, S. Pimm, B. Maurer (1996)
Population variability of sparrows in space and timeOikos, 76
R. Channell, Mark Lomolino (2000)
Trajectories to extinction: spatial dynamics of the contraction of geographical rangesJournal of Biogeography, 27
(1998)
Key sites for conservation : area - selection methods for biodiversity
M. Araújo (1999)
Distribution patterns of biodiversity and the design of a representative reserve network in PortugalDiversity and Distributions, 5
P. Williams, D. Gibbons, C. Margules, A. Rebelo, C. Humphries, R. Pressey (1996)
A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British BirdsConservation Biology, 10
R. Cowling, R. Pressey, A. Lombard, P. Desmet, A. Ellis (1999)
From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species‐rich mediterranean‐climate desert of southern AfricaDiversity and Distributions, 5
R. Dennis, W. Williams (1995)
Implications of biogeographical structures for the conservation of European butterflies
Andrew Gonzalez, J. Lawton, F. Gilbert, T. Blackburn, I. Evans-Freke (1998)
Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystemScience, 281 5385
(1994)
Declining farmland bird species: modelling geographical patterns of abundance in Britain. Pages 153-177 in P
B. Griffith, J. Scott, J. Carpenter, C. Reed (1989)
Translocation as a Species Conservation Tool: Status and StrategyScience, 245
E. Odum (1954)
Fundamentals of ecology
R. Church, D. Stoms, F. Davis (1996)
Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problemBiological Conservation, 76
F. Agterberg (1996)
Interactive spatial data analysisComputers & Geosciences, 22
R. Hengeveld, J. Haeck (1981)
The distribution of abundance . Two Models and implications, 84
F. Goldsmith, P. Edwards, R. May, N. Webb (1995)
Large-Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology.Journal of Applied Ecology, 32
K. Gaston, R. David (1994)
Hotspots Across Europe, 2
Hutchinson Hutchinson (1957)
Concluding remarks.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22
J. Lawton (1994)
Population dynamic principlesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 344
Reid Reid (1998)
Biodiversity hotspots.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13
A. Dobson, J. Rodríguez, W. Roberts, D. Wilcove (1997)
Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United StatesScience, 275
B. Maurer (1999)
Untangling Ecological Complexity: The Macroscopic Perspective
R. Whittaker (1967)
GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION*Biological Reviews, 42
Paul Williams, Miguel Araéjo (2000)
Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservationProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
M. Kershaw, G. Mace, Paul Williams (1995)
Threatened Status, Rarity, and Diversity as Alternative Selection Measures for Protected Areas: A Test Using Afrotropical AntelopesConservation Biology, 9
Biodiversity and WORLDMAP. Natural History Museum
C. Margules, R. Pressey (2000)
Systematic conservation planningNature, 405
(1998)
Algorithms , politics and timber : an example of the role of science in a public political negotiation process over new conservation areas in production forests
(2001)
Hotspots and Range Margins Araújo & Williams Conservation Biology
T. Halliday, J. Gasc, A. Cabela, J. Cronbrnja-Isailovic, D. Dolman, K. Grossenbacher, P. Haffner, J. Lescure, H. Martens, J. Rica, H. Maurin, M. Oliveira, T. Sofianidou, M. Veith, A. Zulderwijk (1997)
Atlas of Amphibians and Reptiles in Europe
D. Goodman (1987)
Viable Populations for Conservation: The demography of chance extinction
R. Vane-Wright, C. Humphries, Paul Williams (1991)
What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choiceBiological Conservation, 55
(1998)
Integrating population abundance , dynamics and distribution into broad scale priority setting
P. Lesica, F. Allendorf (1995)
When Are Peripheral Populations Valuable for ConservationConservation Biology, 9
(1999)
From dot maps to bitmaps: Atlas Florae Europaeae goes digital
C. Stern (1950)
CONCLUDING REMARKS OF THE CHAIRMANCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 15
Lomolino Lomolino, Channell Channell (1995)
Splendid isolation: patterns of range collapse in endangered mammals.Journal of Mammalogy, 76
S. Kark, P. Alkon, U. Safriel, E. Randi (1999)
Conservation Priorities for Chukar Partridge in Israel Based on Genetic Diversity across an Ecological GradientConservation Biology, 13
W. Branch, G. Benn, A. Lombard (1995)
The tortoises (Testudinidae) and terrapins (Pelomedusidae) of southern Africa: their diversity, distribution and conservationSouth African Journal of Zoology, 30
A. Long, M. Crosby, A. Stattersfield (1996)
Towards a Global Map of Biodiversity: Patterns in the Distribution of Restricted-Range Birds, 5
Hagemeijer of the European Bird Census Council. Data were combined with help from
G. Caughley, D. Grice, R. Barker, B. Brown (1988)
THE EDGE OF THE RANGEJournal of Animal Ecology, 57
C. Rahbek (1995)
The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern?Ecography, 18
James Brown (1984)
On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of SpeciesThe American Naturalist, 124
I. Stout, O. Frankel, M. Soulé (1983)
Conservation and EvolutionJournal of Wildlife Management, 47
G. Stevens (1992)
The Elevational Gradient in Altitudinal Range: An Extension of Rapoport's Latitudinal Rule to AltitudeThe American Naturalist, 140
Mark Cooper, M. Plessis (1998)
Biodiversity hotspots in the developing world.Trends in ecology & evolution, 13 10
Abstract: It has been suggested that using complementarity to identify networks of important areas for conserving biodiversity may preferentially select areas within the margins of species ranges. We tested this idea by examining the location of complementarity hotspots in relation to two measures of range core‐periphery. The first measures patterns of aggregation among records within each species' range to identify areas within the core (i.e., areas with aggregated distributions) and periphery (i.e., areas with scattered distributions) of the range. The second measures spatial turnover among species to identify areas with a high density of range edges. For three selected groups of terrestrial vertebrates in Europe—mammals, birds, and herptiles—areas chosen based on complementarity were located within the margins of species' ranges more often than expected by chance. This pattern was consistent for the two measures of core‐periphery we used. The bias of complementarity hotspots toward marginal populations is especially important for species with restricted range sizes. If extinctions are determined mainly by demographic factors, then selecting areas at the peripheries of species' ranges might be a poor option. But if extinctions are determined mainly by extrinsic factors, then peripheral populations might be important to ensure the long‐term persistence of species.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Dec 14, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.