Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Gerber, L. Hatch (2002)
ARE WE RECOVERING? AN EVALUATION OF RECOVERY CRITERIA UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACTEcological Applications, 12
B. Czech, P. Krausman, P. Devers (2000)
Economic Associations among Causes of Species Endangerment in the United States, 50
Paul McErlain-Ward (1996)
Science and the Endangered Species ActJournal of Animal Ecology, 65
F. James (1999)
Lessons Learned from a Study of Habitat Conservation PlanningBioScience, 49
J. Hoekstra, J. Clark, W. Fagan, P. Boersma (2002)
A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT RECOVERY PLANSEcological Applications, 12
T. Foin, S. Riley, A. Pawley, D. Ayres, T. Carlsen, P. Hodum, P. Switzer (1998)
IMPROVING RECOVERY PLANNING FOR THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIESBioScience, 48
D. Wilcove, D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, E. Losos (1998)
QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATESBioScience, 48
L. Gerber, C. Schultz (2001)
Authorship and the Use of Biological Information in Endangered Species Recovery PlansConservation Biology, 15
D. Schemske, B. Husband, M. Ruckelshaus, C. Goodwillie, I. Parker, J. Bishop (1994)
Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plantsEcology, 75
K. Smallwood, J. Beyea, M. Morrison (1999)
FORUM: Using the Best Scientific Data for Endangered Species ConservationEnvironmental Management, 24
T. Tear, J. Scott, P. Hayward, B. Griffith (1993)
Status and prospects for success of the endangered species act: a look at recovery plans.Science, 262 5136
(1994)
The Endangered Species Act : Its history , provisions , and effectiveness
P. Kareiva, S. Andelman, D. Doak, B. Elderd, M. Groom, J. Hoekstra, Laura Hood, F. James, John Lamoreux, G. LeBuhn, C. McCulloch, J. Regetz, L. Savage, M. Ruckelshaus, D. Skelly, H. Wilbur, K. Zamudio (1998)
Using Science in Habitat Conservation Plans
(1998)
Notice of availability of a final addendum to the handbook for habitat conservation planning and incidental take permitting process
Articles How Good Are Endangered Species Recovery Plans? P. DEE BOERSMA, PETER KAREIVA, WILLIAM F. FAGAN, J. ALAN CLARK, AND JONATHAN M. HOEKSTRA cience should be able to guide management Sactions intended to help species that are at risk of ex- THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RECOVERY PLANS tinction. One of the best ways to ask whether science is do- FOR ENDANGERED SPECIES CAN BE IM- ing this job in conservation is to examine the implementation of the US Endangered Species Act (ESA). The ESA’s ultimate PROVED THROUGH INCORPORATION OF goal is to recover listed species (NRC 1995). As part of the re- covery process, the ESA requires the US Fish and Wildlife Ser- DYNAMIC, EXPLICIT SCIENCE IN THE RE- vice (USFWS) or the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to develop recovery plans for all listed species, un- COVERY PROCESS, SUCH AS STRONGLY less the agency determines that a recovery plan will not pro- LINKING SPECIES’ BIOLOGY TO RECOVERY mote the conservation of a particular species (16 USC 1533[f ][1]). Recovery plans are the central documents avail- CRITERIA able to decisionmakers and serve as guides for the manage- ment and recovery of threatened and endangered species. Be- cause these plans play
BioScience – Oxford University Press
Published: Aug 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.