Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Experimental tests of minimum viable population size

Experimental tests of minimum viable population size Fitness and rates of extinction were compared among populations of the housefly, Musca domestica L., kept either at constant effective sizes of 50, 500 or 1500 or passed through extreme founder events reducing effective size to 5. Populations were maintained for 24 generations, which for small to medium‐sized mammals would be less than the 200 years suggested by Souléet al. (1986) as necessary for maintaining viable populations of endangered species. The results demonstrate that effective population sizes have to be greater than the 50 individuals suggested by Franklin (1980) to retain fitness and escape extinction, even in the short term. In contrast to populations of constant size that exhibited monotonic decreases in fitness through time, populations established with few founders rebounded from initial inbreeding depression. However, they were less adaptable to environmental stress than constant size populations, suggesting that populations founded with few numbers may do well within a single environment but may do far less well if they are reintroduced to natural environments or exposed to rapid environmental changes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Animal Conservation Wiley

Experimental tests of minimum viable population size

Reed, David H.; Bryant, Edwin H.
Animal Conservation , Volume 3 (1) – Feb 1, 2000
Download PDF
8 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/experimental-tests-of-minimum-viable-population-size-wvnwcW53vR

References (97)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
"Copyright © 2000 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company"
ISSN
1367-9430
eISSN
1469-1795
DOI
10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00082.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Fitness and rates of extinction were compared among populations of the housefly, Musca domestica L., kept either at constant effective sizes of 50, 500 or 1500 or passed through extreme founder events reducing effective size to 5. Populations were maintained for 24 generations, which for small to medium‐sized mammals would be less than the 200 years suggested by Souléet al. (1986) as necessary for maintaining viable populations of endangered species. The results demonstrate that effective population sizes have to be greater than the 50 individuals suggested by Franklin (1980) to retain fitness and escape extinction, even in the short term. In contrast to populations of constant size that exhibited monotonic decreases in fitness through time, populations established with few founders rebounded from initial inbreeding depression. However, they were less adaptable to environmental stress than constant size populations, suggesting that populations founded with few numbers may do well within a single environment but may do far less well if they are reintroduced to natural environments or exposed to rapid environmental changes.

Journal

Animal Conservation – Wiley

Published: Feb 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.