Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Driscoll (2004)
Extinction and outbreaks accompany fragmentation of a reptile communityEcological Applications, 14
B. Schmidt (2005)
Monitoring the distribution of pond‐breeding amphibians when species are detected imperfectlyAquatic Conservation-marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 15
M. Kéry, Hans Schmid (2004)
Monitoring programs need to take into account imperfect species detectabilityBasic and Applied Ecology, 5
I. Oliver, A. Beattie (1996)
Designing a Cost‐Effective Invertebrate Survey: A Test of Methods for Rapid Assessment of BiodiversityEcological Applications, 6
J. Niemelä, Y. Haila, E. Halme, T. Pajunen, P. Punttila (1992)
Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taigaJournal of Biogeography, 19
B. McGill, R. Etienne, J. Gray, David Alonso, Marti Anderson, Habtamu Benecha, M. Dornelas, B. Enquist, Jessica Green, F. He, A. Hurlbert, A. Magurran, P. Marquet, B. Maurer, A. Ostling, C. Soykan, K. Ugland, E. White (2007)
Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework.Ecology letters, 10 10
J. Meggs, S. Munks, R. Corkrey, K. Richards (2004)
Development and evaluation of predictive habitat models to assist the conservation planning of a threatened lucanid beetle, Hoplogonus simsoni , in north-east TasmaniaBiological Conservation, 118
D. Hall (2000)
Zero‐Inflated Poisson and Binomial Regression with Random Effects: A Case StudyBiometrics, 56
E. Hyvärinen, J. Kouki, P. Martikainen (2006)
A comparison of three trapping methods used to survey forest-dwelling ColeopteraEuropean Journal of Endocrinology, 103
M. Kéry (2002)
Inferring the absence of a species -- a case study of snakesJournal of Wildlife Management, 66
Hanski (1998)
Metapopulation dynamicsNature, 396
W. Gu, R. Swihart (2004)
Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat modelsBiological Conservation, 116
F. Preston (1962)
The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part IEcology, 43
M. Loreau, Christian Nolf (1993)
Occupation of space by the carabid beetle Abax aterActa Oecologica-international Journal of Ecology, 14
M. Judas, Klaus Dornieden, Ulrich Strothmann (2002)
Distribution patterns of carabid beetle species at the landscape‐levelJournal of Biogeography, 29
S. Eber, R. Brandl (1996)
Metapopulation Dynamics of the Tephritid Fly Urophora cardui: An Evaluation of Incidence-Function Model Assumptions with Field DataJournal of Animal Ecology, 65
F. Preston (1979)
The Invisible BirdsEcology, 60
B. Wintle, R. Kavanagh, M. McCarthy, M. Burgman (2005)
ESTIMATING AND DEALING WITH DETECTABILITY IN OCCUPANCY SURVEYS FOR FOREST OWLS AND ARBOREAL MARSUPIALS, 69
K. Mier, S. Picquelle (2008)
Estimating abundance of spatially aggregated populations: comparing adaptive sampling with other survey designsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 65
Graeme Smith, G. Arnold, S. Sarre, M. Abensperg-Traun, D. Steven (1996)
The effects of habitat fragmentation and livestock grazing on animal communities in remnants of gimlet Eucalyptus salubris woodland in the Western Australian wheatbelt. I. ArthropodsJournal of Applied Ecology, 33
Heike Antvogel, A. Bonn (2001)
Environmental parameters and microspatial distribution of insects: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forestEcography, 24
C. Scott (1998)
SAMPLING METHODS FOR ESTIMATING CHANGE IN FOREST RESOURCESEcological Applications, 8
K. Davies, C. Margules (1998)
Effects of habitat fragmentation on carabid beetles: experimental evidenceJournal of Animal Ecology, 67
J. Holland, J. Perry, L. Winder (1999)
The within-field spatial and temporal distribution of arthropods in winter wheatBulletin of Entomological Research, 89
S. Field, A. Tyre, H. Possingham (2005)
OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF MONITORING EFFORT UNDER ECONOMIC AND OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS, 69
J. Pellet, B. Schmidt (2005)
Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence.Biological Conservation, 123
M. Christman (2000)
A Review of Quadrat-Based Sampling of Rare, Geographically Clustered PopulationsJournal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, 5
S. Digweed (1995)
Digging out the "digging-in effect" of pitfall traps : Influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera : Carabidae)Pedobiologia, 39
B. Wintle, M. McCarthy, K. Parris, M. Burgman (2004)
PRECISION AND BIAS OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POINT SURVEY DETECTION PROBABILITIESEcological Applications, 14
G. Sargeant, Douglas Johnson, W. Berg (2003)
Sampling designs for carnivore scent-station surveysJournal of Wildlife Management, 67
A. Moilanen (2002)
Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and applicationOikos, 96
Preston Preston (1962)
The canonical distribution of commonness and rarityEcology, 43
D. Driscoll (2008)
The frequency of metapopulations, metacommunities and nestedness in a fragmented landscapeOikos, 117
L. Bromham, M. Cardillo, A. Bennett, M. Elgar (1999)
Effects of stock grazing on the ground invertebrate fauna of woodland remnantsAustral Ecology, 24
J. Niemalä, E. Halme, Y. Haila (1990)
Balancing sampling effort in pitfall trapping of carabid beetles.Entomologica Fennica, 1
David Lunn, Andrew Thomas, N. Best, D. Spiegelhalter (2000)
WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibilityStatistics and Computing, 10
I. Ribera, S. Dolédec, I. Downie, G. Foster (2001)
Effect of land disturbance and stress on species traits of ground beetle assemblagesEcology, 82
B. McArdle (1990)
When are rare species not thereOikos, 57
D. MacKenzie, J. Royle (2005)
Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effortJournal of Applied Ecology, 42
S. Baker, L. Barmuta (2006)
Evaluating spatial autocorrelation and depletion in pitfall-trap studies of environmental gradientsJournal of Insect Conservation, 10
A. O'connell, Neil Talancy, L. Bailey, J. Sauer, R. Cook, A. Gilbert (2006)
Estimating Site Occupancy and Detection Probability Parameters for Meso- And Large Mammals in a Coastal Ecosystem, 70
D. Driscoll (2007)
How to find a metapopulationCanadian Journal of Zoology, 85
D. MacKenzie, J. Nichols, Nicole Sutton, K. Kawanishi, L. Bailey (2005)
IMPROVING INFERENCES IN POPULATION STUDIES OF RARE SPECIES THAT ARE DETECTED IMPERFECTLYEcology, 86
C. Gimaret-Carpentier, R. Pélissier, J. Pascal, F. Houllier (1998)
Sampling strategies for the assessment of tree species diversityJournal of Vegetation Science, 9
S. Baker, A. Richardson, L. Barmuta, Russell Thomson (2006)
Why conservation reserves should not always be concentrated in riparian areas: A study of ground-dwelling beetles in wet eucalypt forestBiological Conservation, 133
N. Yoccoz, J. Nichols, T. Boulinier (2001)
Monitoring of biological diversity in space and timeTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 16
Karthikeyan Vasudevan, Ajith Kumar, B. Noon, R. Chellam (2008)
Density and Diversity of Forest Floor Anurans in the Rain Forests of Southern Western Ghats, India, 64
J. Niemelä, J. Spence (1994)
Distribution of forest dwelling carabids (Coleoptera): spatial scale and the concept of communitiesEcography, 17
J. Rhodes, A. Tyre, Niclas Jonzén, C. McAlpine, H. Possingham (2006)
Optimizing Presence–Absence Surveys For Detecting Population Trends, 70
P. Martikainen, J. Kouki, Osmo Heikkala (2006)
The effects of green tree retention and subsequent prescribed burning on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in boreal pine‐dominated forestsEcography, 29
D. MacKenzie, J. Nichols, Gideon Lachman, S. Droege, J. Royle, C. Langtimm (2002)
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONEEcology, 83
E. Halme, J. Niemelä (1993)
Carabid beetles in fragments of coniferous forestAnnales Zoologici Fennici, 30
A. Tyre, B. Tenhumberg, S. Field, D. Niejalke, K. Parris, H. Possingham (2003)
IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATESEcological Applications, 13
M. Kéry, John Spillmann, C. Truong, R. Holderegger (2006)
How biased are estimates of extinction probability in revisitation studies?Journal of Ecology, 94
D. Driscoll (2005)
Is the matrix a sea? Habitat specificity in a naturally fragmented landscapeEcological Entomology, 30
L. Bailey, T. Simons, K. Pollock (2004)
ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY AND SPECIES DETECTION PROBABILITY PARAMETERS FOR TERRESTRIAL SALAMANDERSEcological Applications, 14
R. Blackshaw, R. Vernon (2006)
Spatiotemporal stability of two beetle populations in non-farmed habitats in an agricultural landscapeJournal of Applied Ecology, 43
B. Obermeyer (1998)
A Comparison of Quadrats Versus Timed Snorkel Searches for Assessing Freshwater Mussels, 139
D. MacKenzie, L. Bailey, J. Nichols (2004)
Investigating species co-occurrence patterns when species are detected imperfectlyJournal of Animal Ecology, 73
D. Kotze, J. Niemelä (2002)
Year‐to‐year variation in carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages on the Åland Islands, south‐west FinlandJournal of Biogeography, 29
Geoffrey Heard, P. Robertson, M. Scroggie (2006)
Assessing detection probabilities for the endangered growling grass frog (Litoria raniformis) in southern VictoriaWildlife Research, 33
Hyvarinen Hyvarinen, Kouki Kouki, Martikainen Martikainen (2006)
A comparison of three trapping methods used to survey forest‐dwelling ColeopteraEur. J. Entomol., 103
K. Ribeiro, C. Codeço, G. Fernandes (2003)
Local and regional spatial distribution of an eruptive and a latent herbivore insect speciesAustral Ecology, 28
L. Cole, D. McCracken, P. Dennis, I. Downie, Anna Griffin, G. Foster, K. Murphy, T. Waterhouse (2002)
Relationships between agricultural management and ecological groups of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on Scottish farmlandAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93
D. Bohan, A. Bohan, David Glen, W. Symondson, Christopher Wiltshire, L. Hughes (2000)
Spatial dynamics of predation by carabid beetles on slugsJournal of Animal Ecology, 69
M. Luff (1975)
Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall trapsOecologia, 19
D. Bolger, A. Suarez, K. Crooks, S. Morrison, T. Case (2000)
Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in southern California: Area, age, and edge effectsEcological Applications, 10
False absences in wildlife surveys make it difficult to identify metapopulation processes, increase uncertainty of management decisions and bias parameter estimates in habitat models. Despite these risks, the number of species that can be detected with a certain probability in a community survey has rarely been examined. I sampled beetles over 5 months using pitfall trap grids at three rainforest locations in Tasmania, Australia. I compared detection probability for dispersed and clustered sampling schemes using a zero‐inflated binomial model and a simpler occurrence method to calculate the probability of detection. After excluding extremely rare species, I analysed 12 of 121 species. Only three to six species could be detected with 95% probability using a sampling effort that is frequently applied in ecological studies. A majority of common species had a mid summer peak in detection probability meaning that survey effort could be reduced from 5 to 2 months with only a small reduction in data quality. Most species occurred at only a proportion of sample points within locations. Despite the implied spatial structuring, three small grids within a location detected 10 of 12 species as effectively as large, dispersed grids. This study warns that as little as 5% of the beetle fauna may have a 95% probability of detection using the frequently applied pitfall trap method, highlighting a substantial limitation in our ability to accurately map the distributions of ground invertebrates. Whether very large sample sizes can overcome this limitation remains to be examined.
Austral Ecology – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.