Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. MacGregor, P. Slovic (1989)
Perception of Risk in Automotive SystemsHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 31
(1993)
Ecological Risk Assessment, Symposium on Critical Issues in Risk Assessment
Kraus Kraus, Malmfors Malmfors, Slovic Slovic (1992)
Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical RisksRisk Anal., 12
A. Alhakami, P. Slovic (1994)
A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 14 6
William Burns, P. Slovic, R. Kasperson, J. Kasperson, Ortwin Renn, S. Emani (1993)
Incorporating Structural Models into Research on the Social Amplification of Risk: Implications for Theory Construction and Decision MakingRisk Analysis, 13
P. Slovic (1987)
Perception of risk.Science, 236 4799
R. Kasperson, Ortwin Renn, P. Slovic, H. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. Kasperson, S. Ratick (1988)
The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual FrameworkRisk Analysis, 8
N. Neil, T. Malmfors, P. Slovic (1992)
Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical RisksToxicologic Pathology, 22
C. Travis, J. Morris (1992)
The Emergence of Ecological Risk Assessment1Risk Analysis, 12
R. Gregory, R. Mendelsohn (1993)
Perceived Risk, Dread, and BenefitsRisk Analysis, 13
(1992)
Sewage Discharge: Efl'ecrs on the OHshore Marine Environment, Liquid Waste Management Plan Information Paper
Fischhoff Fischhoff, Watson Watson, Hope Hope (1984)
Defining RiskPolicy Sciences, 17
Technological Stigma
T. McDaniels, M. Kamlet, G. Fischer (1992)
Risk perception and the value of safety.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 12 4
P. Slovic (1992)
Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm
S. Rayner, R. Cantor (1987)
How Fair Is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice1Risk Analysis, 7
Relatively little attention has been paid to the role of human perception and judgment in ecological risk management. This paper attempts to characterize perceived ecological risk, using the psychometric paradigm developed in the domain of human health risk perception. The research began by eliciting a set of scale characteristics and risk items (e.g., technologies, actions, events, beliefs) from focus group participants. Participants in the main study were 68 university students who completed a survey instrument that elicited ratings for each of 65 items on 30 characteristic scales and one scale regarding general risk to natural environments. The results are presented in terms of mean responses over individuals for each scale and item combination. Factor analyses show that five factors characterize the judgment data. These have been termed: impact on species, human benefits, impact on humans, avoidability, and knowledge of impacts. The factor results correspond with initial expectations and provide a plausible characterization of judgments regarding ecological risk. Some comparisons of mean responses for selected individual items are also presented.
Risk Analysis – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.