Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Lambert, A. Marshall (1991)
Keystone Characteristics of Bird-Dispersed Ficus in a Malaysian Lowland Rain ForestJournal of Ecology, 79
M. Hossaert‐McKey, M. Gibernau, J. Frey (1994)
Chemosensory attraction of fig wasps to substances produced by receptive figsEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 70
J. Bronstein (1994)
Our Current Understanding of MutualismThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 69
F. Kjellberg (1988)
Longevity of a fig wasp (Blastophaga psenes), 91
S. Compton, S. Ross, I. Thornton (1994)
Pollinator limitation of fig tree reproduction on the island of Anak Krakatau, IndonesiaBiotropica, 26
J. Bronstein, P. Gouyon, C. Gliddon, F. Kjellberg, G. Michaloud (1990)
THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF FLOWERING ASYNCHRONY IN MONOECIOUS FIGS: A SIMULATION STUDY'Ecology, 71
B. Ramírez (1970)
HOST SPECIFICITY OF FIG WASPS (AGAONIDAE).Evolution, 24
Aviva Patel, Marie‐Charlotte Anstett, M. Hossaert-McKey, F. Kjellberg (1995)
Pollinators entering female dioecious figs: why commit suicide?Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 8
F. Kjellberg, S. Maurice (1989)
Seasonality in the reproductive phenology ofFicus: Its evolution and consequencesExperientia, 45
John Smith (1976)
Evolution and the theory of games, 78
A. Gautier-hion, G. Michaloud (1989)
Are Figs Always Keystone Resources for Tropical Frugivorous Vertebrates? A Test in GabonEcology, 70
D. Morrison (1978)
Foraging Ecology and Energetics of the Frugivorous Bat Artibeus JamaicensisEcology, 59
F. Kjellberg, P. Gouyon, M. Ibrahim, M. Raymond, G. Valdeyron (1987)
THE STABILITY OF THE SYMBIOSIS BETWEEN DIOECIOUS FIGS AND THEIR POLLINATORS: A STUDY OF FICUS CARICA L. AND BLASTOPHAGA PSENES L.Evolution, 41
Donald Windsor, D. Morrison, M. Estribi, B. Leon (1989)
Phenology of fruit and leaf production by ‘strangler’ figs on Barro Colorado Island, PanamáExperientia, 45
J. Bronstein, Aviva Patel (1992)
CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF WITHIN‐TREE PHENOLOGICAL PATTERNS IN THE FLORIDA STRANGLING FIG, FICUS AUREA (MORACEAE)American Journal of Botany, 79
S. Compton (1993)
One way to be a figAfrican Entomology, 1
J. Nason, E. Herre, J. Hamrick (1996)
Paternity analysis of the breeding structure of strangler fig populations: evidence for substantial long-distance wasp dispersalJournal of Biogeography, 23
B. Khadari, M. Gibernau, Marie‐Charlotte Anstett, F. Kjellberg, M. Hossaert-McKey (1995)
When figs wait for pollinators: the length of fig receptivityAmerican Journal of Botany, 82
W. Allee, G. Rosenthal (1949)
Group Survival Value for Philodina Rosola, A RotiferEcology, 30
C. Berg (1989)
Classification and distribution ofFicusExperientia, 45
A. Douglas, D. Smith (1989)
Are endosymbioses mutualistic?Trends in ecology & evolution, 4 11
L. Newton, A. Lomo (1979)
The pollination of Ficus vogelii in GhanaBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 78
R. Primack (1985)
Longevity of individual flowersAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 16
D. McKey (1989)
Population biology of figs: Applications for conservationExperientia, 45
J. Bronstein (1989)
A mutualism at the edge of its rangeExperientia, 45
J. Wiebes (1979)
CO-EVOLUTION OF FIGS AND THEIR INSECT POLLINATORSAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 10
G. Michaloud (1988)
Aspects de la reproduction des figuiers monoi͏̈ques en forêt équatoriale africaine
K. Milton, D. Windsor, D. Morrison, M. Estribi (1982)
Fruiting Phenologies of Two Neotropical Ficus SpeciesEcology, 63
J. Bronstein, M. Hossaert-McKey (1995)
Hurricane Andrew and a Florida fig pollination mutualism: resilience of an obligate interactionBiotropica, 27
Fig trees and their pollinating wasps form ca. 750 pairs of obligate mutualists, mainly in the tropics. Survival of each partner depends on that of its associated species. Here, we examine the possible outcome of such an interaction at small population size. Using phenology data collected on Ficus natalensis in Gabon, we modelled wasp survival and the reproductive success of the trees according to the duration of receptivity of the tree, the amplitude of flowering seasonality, and the size of the fig tree population. Since the duration of receptivity is critical in these population level models, we also determined the influence of individual selection on this phenological trait. The models give three major results: (1) The minimum fig population size required to sustain a wasp population increases with the amplitude of seasonality, and decreases with increasing duration of receptivity; (2) tree population reproductive success is higher when the duration of receptivity is longer and when the population is large, but (3) individual selection toward a long duration of receptivity is weak or absent.
Oecologia – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.