Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1986)
Book Reviews : Online Communities: A Case Study of the Office of the FutureSocial Science Computer Review, 4
O. Helmer (1967)
ANALYSIS OF THE FUTURE: THE DELPHI METHOD
E. Meehan, R. Rice (1984)
The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31
S. Kiesler, D. Zubrow, Annie Moses, V. Geller (1985)
Affect in Computer-Meditated Communication: An Experiment in Synchronous Terminal-to-Terminal DiscussionHum. Comput. Interact., 1
S. Hiltz, M. Turoff, Kenneth Johnson (1985)
Mode of communication and the "risky shift" : a controlled experiment with computerized conferencing and anonymity in a large corporation
John Short, Ederyn Williams, B. Christie (1976)
The social psychology of telecommunications
Ederyn Williams (1977)
Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 84
P. Burke (1974)
Participation and leadership in small groups.American sociological review, 39 6
B. Collins, H. Guetzkow (1964)
A social psychology of group processes for decision-making
I. Lorge, D. Fox, J. Davitz, M. Brenner (1958)
A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957.Psychological bulletin, 55 6
Gene Fowler, Marilyn Wackerbarth (1980)
Audio teleconferencing versus face‐to‐face conferencing: A synthesis of the literatureWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 44
H. Linstone, M. Turoff (1976)
The Delphi method : techniques and applications
H. Lamm, G. Trommsdorff (1973)
Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency
S. Hiltz, Kenneth Johnson, M. Turoff (1982)
The effects of formal human leadership and computer-generated decision aids on problem solving via computer : a controlled experiment
Adrianson Adrianson, Hjelmquist Hjelmquist (1985)
Small group communication in two media: Face‐to‐face communication and computer‐mediated communicationGoteborg Psychological Reports, 15
A. Ven, A. Delbecq (1974)
The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making ProcessesAcademy of Management Journal, 17
R. Katzell, C. Miller, N. Rotter, T. Venet (1970)
Effects of leadership and other inputs on group processes and outputs.The Journal of social psychology, 80 2
Randy Hirokawa, M. Poole (1986)
Communication and Group Decision-Making
R. Potvin, A. Hare (1962)
Handbook of small group research
A. Chapanis (1975)
Interactive human communicationComputer Supported Cooperative Work
B. Burleson, Barbara Levine, Wendy Samter (1984)
DECISION‐MAKING PROCEDURE AND DECISION QUALITYHuman Communication Research, 10
I. Janis (1972)
Victims Of Groupthink
S. Hiltz, M. Turoff (1985)
Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overloadCommun. ACM, 28
S. Hiltz, Kenneth Johnson, Gail Agle (1978)
Replicating Bales Problem Solving Experiments on a Computerized Conference:A Pilot Study
R. Bales, F. Strodtbeck, T. Mills, M. Roseborough (1951)
Channels of communication in small groups.American Sociological Review, 16
R. Johansen, J. Vallee, K. Spangler (1979)
Electronic meetings : technical alternatives and social choices
S. Kiesler, J. Siegel, T. McGuire (1984)
Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communicationComputer Supported Cooperative Work
M. Shaw (1971)
Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior
I. Steiner (1972)
Group process and productivity
R. Johansen (1977)
Social evaluations of teleconferencingTelecommunications Policy, 1
T. Parsons (1953)
The Social System
Richard Hackman, C. Morris (1975)
Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integrationAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8
R. Pye, Ederyn Williams (1977)
Teleconferencing: is video valuable or is audio adequate?Telecommunications Policy, 1
S. Hiltz, M. Turoff (1979)
Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer
A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to explore the process and outcome of small group problem‐solving discussions for two modes of communication (face‐to‐face and computerized conferencing) and two types of tasks (a qualitative human relations task and a scientific ranking test with a criterion solution). Interaction process was coded using Bales Interaction Process Analysis. There were two to three times as many communication units in the face to‐face groups consisting of five members each as in the computerized conferencing mode of communication during the same elapsed time. Group decisions were equally good in the two modes, but the groups were less likely to reach agreement in the computerized conferencing mode. There were proportionately more of the types of task‐oriented communication associated with decision quality in the computerized conferences.
Human Communication Research – Oxford University Press
Published: Dec 1, 1986
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.