Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kafka (1971)
Ambiguity for Individuation: A Critique and Reformation of Double-Bind TheoryArchives of General Psychiatry, 25
Stephen Bahr, B. Rollins (1971)
Crisis and Conjugal Power.Journal of Marriage and Family, 33
L. Wynne, I. Ryckoff, J. Day, S. Hirsch (1958)
Pseudo-mutuality in the family relations of schizophrenics.Psychiatry, 21 2
Straus Straus (1967)
The Influence of Sex of Child and Social Class on Instrumental and Expressive Family Roles in a Laboratory SettingSocial. Soc. Res., 53
D. Olson, M. Straus (1972)
A Diagnostic Tool for Marital and Family Therapy: The SIMFAM Technique.The Family Coordinator, 21
M. Bowen (1960)
A Family Concept of Schizophrenia.
D. Reiss (1971)
Varieties of Consensual ExperienceFamily Process, 10
D. Olson, Carolyn Rabunsky (1972)
Validity of Four Measures of Family PowerJournal of Marriage and Family, 34
A. Ferreira (1963)
FAMILY MYTH AND HOMEOSTASIS.Archives of general psychiatry, 9
D. Speer (1970)
Family Systems: Morphostasis and Morphogenesis, or “Is Homeostasis Enough?”Family Process, 9
Jacqueline Straus, M. Straus (1968)
Family Roles and Sex Differences in Creativity of Children in Bombay and MinneapolisJournal of Marriage and Family, 30
C. Bowerman, S. Bahr (1973)
Conjugal Power and Adolescent Identification with Parents, 36
M. Straus (1968)
Communication, Creativity, and Problem-solving Ability of Middle-and Working-Class Families in Three SocietiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 73
Reiss Reiss (1971)
Varieties of Consensual Experience. I. A Theory for Relating Family Interaction to Individual ThinkingFam. Proc., 10
Mervyn Cadwallader (1959)
The Cybernetic Analysis of Change in Complex Social OrganizationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 65
Hill Hill (1958)
Social Stresses on the FamilySoc. Casewk., 39
D. Jackson (1960)
The etiology of schizophrenia.American Journal of Psychology, 75
D. Olson, D. Sprenkle, C. Russell (1979)
Circumplex model of marital and family system: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications.Family process, 18 1
E. Wertheim (1973)
Family Unit Therapy and the Science and Typology of Family SystemsFamily Process, 12
This study was designed to test the circumplex model of family systems that hypothesizes moderate family cohesion and moderate adaptability to be more functional than either extreme. Thirty‐one Catholic family triads with daughters ranging in age from 14 to 17 years participated in a structured family interaction game (SIMFAM) and filled out questionnaires that measured the variables of cohesion and adaptability and the facilitative variables of support and creativity. All families were considered normal but were subdivided into those that had more and less difficulty with this adolescent. Analysis of the data yielded considerable support for the circumplex model. High family functioning was associated with moderate family cohesion and adaptability, and low family functioning had extreme scores on these dimensions. As predicted, high family support and creativity were also related to high family functioning. Implications of these findings for family therapy are discussed.
Family Process – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1979
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.