Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A physical explanation for an observed area‐slope‐elevation relationship for catchments with declining relief

A physical explanation for an observed area‐slope‐elevation relationship for catchments with... A general relationship between the contributing area, slope, and mean elevation of catchments with relief declining after a tectonic uplift event is presented. This relationship is based on the continuity equation for runoff and erosion processes in the catchment. The key hypothesis underlying this relationship is that as a catchment declines, the nondimensionalized catchment approaches a constant form. This hypothesis is verified for computer simulated catchments. The area‐slope‐elevation relationship covers several cases: catchments declining toward a peneplain; catchments declining from a high slope dynamic equilibrium (resulting from a high rate of tectonic uplift) to a low slope one (resulting from a lower rate of tectonic uplift); and catchments declining from an elevated initial condition, as, for example, in the decline of a mine spoil heap. A previously published relationship between slope and area for catchments in dynamic equilibrium and based on runoff and erosion physics is shown to be a special case of this general relationship. The new area‐slope‐elevation relationship is compared with data from simulated catchments and a field catchment. It is thus shown that for declining catchments the area‐slope‐elevation relationship is a good predictor of catchment form for catchments with declining relief. It is argued that the slope‐area‐elevation relationship is sufficient, with the planiform drainage pattern, to completely define the elevation properties of the catchment such as, for instance, the hypsometric curve. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Water Resources Research Wiley

A physical explanation for an observed area‐slope‐elevation relationship for catchments with declining relief

Water Resources Research , Volume 30 (2) – Feb 1, 1994

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/a-physical-explanation-for-an-observed-area-slope-elevation-vsvprb49gK

References (20)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the American Geophysical Union.
ISSN
0043-1397
eISSN
1944-7973
DOI
10.1029/93WR01810
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A general relationship between the contributing area, slope, and mean elevation of catchments with relief declining after a tectonic uplift event is presented. This relationship is based on the continuity equation for runoff and erosion processes in the catchment. The key hypothesis underlying this relationship is that as a catchment declines, the nondimensionalized catchment approaches a constant form. This hypothesis is verified for computer simulated catchments. The area‐slope‐elevation relationship covers several cases: catchments declining toward a peneplain; catchments declining from a high slope dynamic equilibrium (resulting from a high rate of tectonic uplift) to a low slope one (resulting from a lower rate of tectonic uplift); and catchments declining from an elevated initial condition, as, for example, in the decline of a mine spoil heap. A previously published relationship between slope and area for catchments in dynamic equilibrium and based on runoff and erosion physics is shown to be a special case of this general relationship. The new area‐slope‐elevation relationship is compared with data from simulated catchments and a field catchment. It is thus shown that for declining catchments the area‐slope‐elevation relationship is a good predictor of catchment form for catchments with declining relief. It is argued that the slope‐area‐elevation relationship is sufficient, with the planiform drainage pattern, to completely define the elevation properties of the catchment such as, for instance, the hypsometric curve.

Journal

Water Resources ResearchWiley

Published: Feb 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.