Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Margolis, J. Walsh (2003)
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by BusinessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 48
J. Harrison, Edward Freeman, J. Harrison (1999)
STAKEHOLDERS, SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVESAcademy of Management Journal, 42
Abagail McWilliams, D. Siegel (2001)
Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 26
C. Fee, Charles Hadlock, J. Pierce (2007)
Investment, Financing Constraints, and Internal Capital Markets: Evidence from the Advertising Expenditures of Multinational FirmsCorporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies
Jacob Cohen, P. Cohen, S. West, L. Aiken (1979)
Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences
Dennis Patten (1991)
Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosureJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10
Abagail McWilliams, D. Siegel (2000)
Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?Strategic Management Journal, 21
William Wan, R. Hoskisson (2003)
Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performanceAcademy of Management Journal, 46
Lavie Lavie (2007)
Alliance portfolios and firm performance: a study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industryStrategic Management Journal, 28
Stephen Brammer, A. Millington (2008)
Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 29
Deborah Webb, Lois Mohr (1998)
A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially ConcernedJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17
T. Jones (1995)
INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICSAcademy of Management Review, 20
R. Wiseman (2009)
On the use and misuse of ratios in strategic management researchResearch Methodology in Strategy and Management, 5
G. McNamara, R. Luce, George Tompson (2002)
Examining the effect of complexity in strategic group knowledge structures on firm performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 23
Wesley Cohen, Daniel Levinthal (1990)
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATIONAdministrative Science Quarterly, 35
Michael Barnett (2005)
Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social ResponsibilityCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR) eJournal
Fee Fee, Hadlock Hadlock, Pierce Pierce (2009)
Investment, financing constraints, and internal capital markets: evidence from the advertising expenditures of multinational firmsReview of Financial Studies, 22
Samuel Graves, S. Waddock (1994)
Institutional Owners and Corporate Social PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 37
Joseph Mahoney, J. Pandian (1992)
The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic managementSouthern Medical Journal, 13
B. Ruf, K. Muralidhar, K. Paul (1998)
The Development of a Systematic, Aggregate Measure of Corporate Social PerformanceJournal of Management, 24
M. Friedman (2007)
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Bradley Agle, T. Donaldson, R. Freeman, Michael Jensen, Ronald Mitchell, Donna Wood (2008)
Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder TheoryBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 18
A. King, C. Zeithaml (2001)
Competencies and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradoxStrategic Management Journal, 22
Ronald Masulis, Cong Wang, Feixue Xie (2006)
Agency Problems at Dual-Class CompaniesCorporate Law: Corporate Governance Law
(1984)
Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective
Mahoney Mahoney, Pandian Pandian (1992)
The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic managementStrategic Management Journal, 13
A. Hillman, Gerald Keim (2001)
Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?Strategic Management Journal, 22
Peter Kennedy (1980)
A Guide to Econometrics
A. Wicks, Shawn Berman, T. Jones (1999)
The Structure of Optimal Trust: Moral and Strategic ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 24
G. McNamara, J. Haleblian, B. Dykes (2008)
The Performance Implications of Participating in an Acquisition Wave: Early Mover Advantages, Bandwagon Effects, and The Moderating Influence of Industry Characteristics and Acquirer TacticsAcademy of Management Journal, 51
Carroll Carroll (1979)
A three‐dimensional conceptual model of corporate performanceAcademy of Management Review, 4
Jensen Jensen, Meckling Meckling (1976)
Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 3
Richard Johnson, D. Greening (1999)
The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 42
A. Chatterji, David Levine, M. Toffel (2008)
How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?ERPN: Social Responsibility
(2002)
Perils of corporate philanthropy
(1975)
Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks
Tim Rowley, Shawn Berman (2000)
A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social PerformanceBusiness & Society, 39
D. Greening, D. Turban (2000)
Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality WorkforceBusiness & Society, 39
W. Greene, 张 成思 (2009)
计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis
John Deckop, K. Merriman, Shruti Gupta (2006)
The Effects of CEO Pay Structure on Corporate Social PerformanceJournal of Management, 32
McNamara McNamara, Luce Luce, Tompson Tompson (2002)
Examining the effect of complexity in strategic group knowledge structures on firm performanceStrategic Management Journal, 23
Pamela Derfus, Patrick Maggitti, C. Grimm, Ken Smith (2008)
The Red Queen Effect: Competitive Actions And Firm PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 51
C. Fombrun, Naomi Gardberg, Michael Barnett (2000)
Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk
P. Wright, Stephen Ferris (1997)
AGENCY CONFLICT AND CORPORATE STRATEGY: THE EFFECT OF DIVESTMENT ON CORPORATE VALUEStrategic Management Journal, 18
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Theory of the Firm
S. Waddock, Samuel Graves (1997)
The corporate social performance-financial performance linkStrategic Management Journal, 18
J. Kmenta (1972)
Elements of econometrics
Griffin Griffin, Mahon Mahon (1997)
The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty‐five years of incomparable researchBusiness and Society, 36
K. Shahzad, S. Bajwa, Shahid Zia (2013)
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & CompetitorsSouth Asian journal of management, 20
J. Griffin, J. Mahon (1997)
The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance DebateBusiness & Society, 36
Masulis Masulis, Wang Wang, Xei Xei (2009)
Agency problems at dual‐class companiesJournal of Finance, 64
Dovev Lavie (2007)
Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software IndustryOrganizations & Markets eJournal
B. Ruf, K. Muralidhar, Robert Brown, Jay Janney, K. Paul (2001)
An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory PerspectiveJournal of Business Ethics, 32
Brammer Brammer, Millington Millington (2008)
Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performanceStrategic Management Journal, 29
Michael Barnett, R. Salomon (2006)
Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship between Social Responsibility and Financial PerformanceSRPN: Other Socially Responsible Investment (Topic)
Marc Orlitzky, F. Schmidt, S. Rynes (2003)
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-AnalysisOrganization Studies, 24
Margarita Tsoutsoura (2004)
Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance
K. Bollen, R. Jackman (1985)
Regression DiagnosticsSociological Methods & Research, 13
Building on the theoretical argument that a firm's ability to profit from social responsibility depends upon its stakeholder influence capacity (SIC), we bring together contrasting literatures on the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) to hypothesize that the CSP‐CFP relationship is U‐shaped. Our results support this hypothesis. We find that firms with low CSP have higher CFP than firms with moderate CSP, but firms with high CSP have the highest CFP. This supports the theoretical argument that SIC underlies the ability to transform social responsibility into profit. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Strategic Management Journal – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.