Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Zenger Zenger, Lawrence Lawrence (1989)
Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communicationAcademy of Management Journal, 32
Souder Souder, Chakrabarti Chakrabarti (November 1979)
Industrial innovations: A demographical analysisIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM–26
Allen Allen, Cohen Cohen (March 1969)
Information flow in research and development laboratoriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 14
Szakonyi Szakonyi (MayJune 1985)
To improve R&D productivity, gain the CEO's supportResearch Management, 28
Globe Globe, Levy Levy, Schwartz Schwartz (1973)
Key factors and events in the innovation processResearch Management, 16
Cooper Cooper (1983)
Most new products do succeedResearch Management, 26
Hopkins Hopkins (May 1981)
New‐product winners and losersResearch Management, 24
Calantone Calantone, Cooper Cooper (1979)
A discriminant model for identifying scenarios of industrial new product failureJournal of Academy Marketing Science, 7
Cooper Cooper (January 1975)
Why new industrial products failIndustrial Marketing Management, 4
Finkelstein Finkelstein (1963)
Evaluating the product of technical programsResearch Management, 6
Calantone Calantone, Cooper Cooper (Spring 1981)
New product scenarios: Prospects for successJournal of Marketing, 45
Pinto Pinto, Slevin Slevin (February 1987)
Critical factors in successful project implementationIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM–34
Pinto Pinto, Mantel Mantel (November 1990)
The causes of project failureIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM–37
Rubenstein Rubenstein, Chakrabarti Chakrabarti, O'Keefe O'Keefe, Souder Souder, Young Young (1976)
Factors influencing innovation success at the project levelResearch Management, 19
Parkinson Parkinson (1982)
The role of the user in successful new product developmentR&D Management, 12
Katz Katz, Allen Allen (1982)
Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groupsR&D Management, 12
Lee Lee, Kim Kim (1986)
Determinants of new product outcome in a developing country: A longitudinal analysisInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 3
McDonough McDonough, Spital Spital (SeptemberOctober 1984)
Quick‐response new product developmentHarvard Business Review, 62
Baker Baker, Green Green, Bean Bean (1986)
Why R&D projects succeed or failResearch Management, 29
Ebadi Ebadi, Utterback Utterback (May 1984)
The effects of communication on technological innovationManagement Science, 30
Kolodny Kolodny (September 1980)
Matrix organization designs and new product successResearch Management, 23
Crawford Crawford (JulyAugust 1987)
New product failure rates: a repriseResearch Management, 30
Cooper Cooper (Summer 1979)
The dimensions of industrial new product success and failureJournal of Marketing, 43
Crawford Crawford (September 1979)
New product failure rates—facts and fallaciesResearch Management, 22
Cooper Cooper, Kleinschmidt Kleinschmidt (1987)
What makes a new product a winner: Success factors at the project levelR&D Management, 17
Gerstenfeld Gerstenfeld (August 1976)
A study of successful projects, unsuccessful projects, and projects in process in West GermanyIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM–23
Schmitt Schmitt (MayJune 1985)
Successful corporate R&DHarvard Business Review, 63
Banting Banting (January 1978)
Unsuccessful innovation in the industrial marketJournal of Marketing, 42
Roberts Roberts, Burke Burke (1974)
Six new products: What made them successful?Research Management, 17
Rothwell Rothwell, Freeman Freeman, Horlsey Horlsey, Jervis Jervis, Robertson Robertson, Townsend Townsend (1974)
SAPPHO Updated—Project SAPPHO Phase IIResearch Policy, 3
Link Link (1987)
Keys to new product success and failureIndustrial Marketing Management, 16
Zirger Zirger, Maidique Maidique (July 1990)
A model of new product development: An empirical testManagement Science, 36
Mushin Lee and Dohyeong Na present their analysis of data obtained from Korean project leaders in order to investigate the relationships between various factors and technical project success. When the radicalness of technical innovativeness is employed as a contingency variable, the result shows that existence of a champion is critical if the innovativeness is radical. Top management's support, R&D, production, and financial capabilities, and information acquisition during the development stage are related to the success, but there is no indication that the radicalness heavily affects the relationships. Information acquisition during the idea generation stage is not important for both radical and incremental improvement projects.
The Journal of Product Innovation Management – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.