Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
O'Leary O'Leary, Husar Husar (2002)
“What Environmental and Natural Resource Attorneys Really Think About ADR: A National Survey.”Natural Resources and Environment, 16
Sullivan Sullivan, Dukes Dukes, Losina Losina (1999)
“Tutorial in Biostatistics: An Introduction to Hierarchical Linear Modeling.”Statistical Medicine, 18
K. Ringdal (1992)
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN Methods for Multilevel AnalysisActa Sociologica, 35
R. O’Leary, Susan Raines (2001)
Lessons Learned from Two Decades of Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs and Processes at the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyPublic Administration Review, 61
Gregory Camilli, Peter Congdon (1999)
Application of a Method of Estimating DIF for Polytomous Test Items, 24
Kloppenburg Kloppenburg (2002)
“Implementation of Court‐Annexed Environmental Mediation: The District of Oregon Pilot Project.”Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 17
N. Sipe, B. Stiftel (1995)
Mediating environmental enforcement disputes: How well does it work?Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15
C. Coglianese (2002)
Is Satisfaction Success? Evaluating Public Participation in Regulatory PolicymakingJohn F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series
L. Susskind, C. Ozawa (1983)
Mediated Negotiation in the Public SectorAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 27
J. Priscoli (1987)
Conflict resolution for water resource projects: using facilitation and mediation to write section 404 general permitsEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review, 7
J. Innes, D. Booher (1999)
Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive SystemsJournal of The American Planning Association, 65
J. Schafer, J. Graham (2002)
Missing data: our view of the state of the art.Psychological methods, 7 2
O'Connell O'Connell, McCoach McCoach (2004)
“Applications of Hierarchical Linear Modeling for Evaluations of Health Interventions: Demystifying the Methods and Interpretations of Multilevel Models.”Evaluation in the Health Professions, 27
Ringdal Ringdal (1992)
“Methods for Multilevel Analysis.”Acta Sociologica, 35
Patricia Orr, Kirk Emerson, D. Keyes (2008)
Environmental conflict resolution practice and performance: An evaluation frameworkConflict Resolution Quarterly, 25
Floyd Floyd, Germain Germain, Terhorst Terhorst (1996)
“A Model for Assessing Negotiations and Mediation in Forest Resource Conflicts.”Journal of Forestry, 94
W. Leach, N. Pelkey, P. Sabatier (2002)
Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and WashingtonJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21
Tanis Frame, T. Gunton, J. Day (2004)
The role of collaboration in environmental management: an evaluation of land and resource planning in British ColumbiaJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47
J. Folger, R. Bush (1996)
Transformative mediation and third‐party intervention: Ten hallmarks of a transformative approach to practiceConflict Resolution Quarterly, 13
Arnold Arnold (1992)
“Methods, Plainly Speaking: An Introduction to Hierarchical Linear Modeling.”Measurement and Education in Counseling and Development, 25
J. Innes, D. Booher (2004)
Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st centuryPlanning Theory & Practice, 5
S. Todd (2001)
Measuring the effectiveness of environmental dispute settlement effortsEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review, 21
N. Sipe (1998)
An Empirical Analysis of Environmental MediationJournal of The American Planning Association, 64
M. Hansen (1996)
Portable technologies: Improving forestry field workJournal of Forestry, 94
Singer Singer (1998)
“Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models.”Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24
A. O'connell, D. McCoach (2004)
Applications of Hierarchical Linear Models for Evaluations of Health InterventionsEvaluation & the Health Professions, 27
Folger Folger, Bush Bush (1996)
“Transformative Mediation and Third‐Party Intervention: Ten Hallmarks of a Transformative Approach to Practice.”Mediation Quarterly, 13
Renée Irvin, J. Stansbury (2004)
Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the effort?Public Administration Review, 64
R. O’Leary, L. Bingham (2003)
Promise and Performance Of Environmental Conflict Resolution
L. Sullivan, K. Dukes, E. Losina (1999)
An introduction to hierarchical linear modellingStatistics in Medicine, 18
Leonard Buckle, Suzann Thomas-Buckle (1986)
Placing environmental mediation in context: Lessons from “failed” mediationsEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review, 6
M. McKinney, P. Field (2008)
Evaluating Community-Based Collaboration on Federal Lands and ResourcesSociety & Natural Resources, 21
E. Dukes (2004)
What we know about environmental conflict resolution: An analysis based on researchConflict Resolution Quarterly, 22
Innes Innes, Booher Booher (1999)
“Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning.”Journal of the American Planning Association, 65
John Andrew (2001)
Examining the Claims of Environmental ADRJournal of Planning Education and Research, 21
Frame Frame, Gunton Gunton, Day Day (2004)
“The Role of Collaborative Planning in Environmental Management: An Evaluation of Land and Resource Management Planning in British Columbia.”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47
Leach Leach (Jan./Feb. 2006)
“Public Involvement in USDA Forest Service Policymaking: A Literature Review.”Journal of Forestry
This empirical study of fifty‐two environmental conflict resolution (ECR) processes is based on an evaluation framework that specifies key conditions and factors that contribute to ECR outcomes. Data were collected on a range of ECR processes and applications. This article reports on findings from a multilevel modeling analysis that focuses on three primary outcomes: reaching agreement, the quality of agreement, and improved working relationships among parties. Effective engagement of parties is identified as a major contributor to all three outcomes. Other key factors that operate directly and indirectly through effective engagement are involvement of appropriate parties, the skills and practices of ECR mediators and facilitators, and incorporation of relevant and high‐quality information. Findings generally support the ECR evaluation framework.
Conflict Resolution Quarterly – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.