Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Emery, E. Trist (1965)
The Causal Texture of Organizational EnvironmentsHuman Relations, 18
Robert Stern, J. Pfeffer, G. Salancik (1979)
The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.Contemporary Sociology, 8
O. Herfindahl (1950)
Concentration in the steel industry
Gregory Dess, D. Beard (1984)
Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.Administrative Science Quarterly, 29
T. Koenig, Robisrt Gogel, J. Sonquist (1979)
Models of the Significance of Interlocking Corporate DirectoratesThe American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 38
P. Bentler, D. Bonett (1980)
Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance StructuresPsychological Bulletin, 88
L. Hayduk (1987)
Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advancesSocial Forces, 14
J. Daugen, P. Binzen (1971)
The Wreck of the Penn Central
Barbara Keats, M. Hitt (1988)
A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 31
M. Adelman (1969)
Comment on the "H" Concentration Measure as a Numbers-EquivalentThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 51
R. Schmalensee (1977)
Using the H-Index of Concentration with Published DataThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 59
I. Grossack (1965)
Towards an Integration of Static and Dynamic Measures of Industry ConcentrationThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 47
J. Pfeffer (1988)
Intercorporate Relations: A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations
P. Slater (1958)
Contrasting Correlates of Group Size, 21
R. Richardson (1987)
Directorship Interlocks and Corporate ProfitabilityAdministrative Science Quarterly, 32
D. Bavly (1986)
What is the board of directors good forLong Range Planning, 19
W. Kelly (1981)
A Generalized Interpretation of the Herfindahl IndexSouthern Economic Journal, 48
Max Bazerman, F. Schoorman (1983)
A Limited Rationality Model of Interlocking Directorates.Academy of Management Review, 8
and Aldrich, J. Pfeffer (1976)
Environments of OrganizationsReview of Sociology, 2
J. Pfeffer (1973)
Size, Composition, and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organization-Environment LinkageAdministrative Science Quarterly, 18
M. Allen (1974)
The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooptation: Interlocking Corporate DirectoratesAmerican Sociological Review, 39
P. Dooley (1969)
The Interlocking DirectorateThe American Economic Review, 59
J. Pfeffer (1972)
Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its EnvironmentAdministrative Science Quarterly, 17
D. Kenny, C. Judd (1984)
Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables.Psychological Bulletin, 96
M. Weidenbaum (1986)
Updating the Corporate BoardJournal of Business Strategy, 7
Aldrich Aldrich (1976)
Resource dependence and interorganizational relations: Local employment service offices and social services sector organizationsAdministration and Society, 7
P. Drucker (1981)
Toward the Next Economics: and Other Essays
H. Aldrich (1976)
Resource Dependence and in Terorganiza Tional RelationsAdministration & Society, 7
R. Stolzenberg (1980)
The Measurement and Decomposition of Causal Effects in Nonlinear and Nonadditive ModelsSociological Methodology, 11
M. Mace (1971)
Directors: Myth and Reality
J. Pfeffer (1972)
Merger as a response to organizational interdependenceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 17
Pamela Tolbert (1985)
Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education.Administrative Science Quarterly, 30
J. Pfeffer, P. Nowak (1976)
Joint Ventures and Interorganizational InterdependenceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 21
Michael Porter (1980)
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
Richard Hackman, C. Morris (1975)
Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integrationAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8
L. Stern, W. Morgenroth (1968)
Concentration, Mutually Recognized Interdependence, and the Allocation of Marketing ResourcesThe Journal of Business, 41
L. Hayduk (1987)
Structural equation modeling with LISREL
R. Mcdonald (1978)
A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structuresBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31
Two competing models of corporate boards are presented. Management control proposes that the board is a rubber stamp for management, and plays a minor role in strategic management, while resource dependence asserts that the board is a tool used to manage environmental uncertainty. A structural model was developed to determine whether corporate boards respond to different types of environmental uncertainty, using data on 147 companies from nine industry groups. It was found that boards tended to be smaller in a more uncertain environment, while having an increased number of interlocks. This relationship was stronger in high‐performing firms.
Strategic Management Journal – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.