Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The art of service recovery: fact or fiction?

The art of service recovery: fact or fiction? Purpose – To determine the impact of service recovery on consumer evaluations of service delivery. Design/methodology/approach – An experiment investigated consumer responses to three dimensions of perceived fairness of recovery efforts: redress, responsiveness, and empathy/courtesy. Findings – Results revealed that higher levels of redress independently increase positive consumer responses. It was further found that the interaction of employee responsiveness and courtesy can also have a dramatic impact on consumer evaluations. Satisfaction was highest and negative word‐of‐mouth (WOM) intentions were lowest only under conditions of high responsiveness and courtesy. Additionally, an interaction between courtesy and tangible rewards significantly decreased the level of negative WOM. Practical implications – The research offers empirical support for the “service recovery paradox” suggesting effective post‐recovery efforts may not only counteract bad service experiences, but may increase satisfaction beyond levels held before the service failure. Originality/value – Key elements for the proper structuring of a service recovery process are identified for management. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Services Marketing Emerald Publishing

The art of service recovery: fact or fiction?

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-art-of-service-recovery-fact-or-fiction-tsMRx0akIs

References (61)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0887-6045
DOI
10.1108/08876040610665652
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – To determine the impact of service recovery on consumer evaluations of service delivery. Design/methodology/approach – An experiment investigated consumer responses to three dimensions of perceived fairness of recovery efforts: redress, responsiveness, and empathy/courtesy. Findings – Results revealed that higher levels of redress independently increase positive consumer responses. It was further found that the interaction of employee responsiveness and courtesy can also have a dramatic impact on consumer evaluations. Satisfaction was highest and negative word‐of‐mouth (WOM) intentions were lowest only under conditions of high responsiveness and courtesy. Additionally, an interaction between courtesy and tangible rewards significantly decreased the level of negative WOM. Practical implications – The research offers empirical support for the “service recovery paradox” suggesting effective post‐recovery efforts may not only counteract bad service experiences, but may increase satisfaction beyond levels held before the service failure. Originality/value – Key elements for the proper structuring of a service recovery process are identified for management.

Journal

Journal of Services MarketingEmerald Publishing

Published: Apr 1, 2006

Keywords: Customer satisfaction; Service failures; Customer service management

There are no references for this article.