Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Perils and Promise of Privately Owned Protected Areas

Perils and Promise of Privately Owned Protected Areas Forum Perils and Promise of Privately Owned Protected Areas JEFFREY A. LANGHOLZ AND JAMES P. LASSOIE overnments have long been the principal force THIS ARTICLE REVIEWS THE CURRENT Gbehind the establishment of protected areas worldwide. The quality of governmental protection, however, has often STATE OF KNOWLEDGE REGARDING proven inadequate, with many parks existing only on paper (Van Schaik et al. 1997, IUCN 1999). Even if publicly owned PRIVATELY OWNED PARKS WORLDWIDE, parks were well protected, more than 93% of the Earth’s land area and most of its biodiversity would still remain vulnera- EMPHASIZING THEIR CURRENT STATUS, ble (WRI et al. 1998). Given ongoing habitat destruction, es- VARIOUS TYPES, AND PRINCIPAL pecially in the tropics (World Bank 1998), it is imperative that the conservation community develop additional approaches STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES for in situ biodiversity protection. Privately owned protected areas have emerged as one option. Private parks are prolifer- ating throughout much of the world, yet little is known about them. Research has begun to address private parks, but only The rise of modern private parks indirectly (Sayer 1991, Schelhas and Greenberg 1993). A few Privately owned protected areas have existed in various forms case studies highlighting various aspects of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png BioScience Oxford University Press

Perils and Promise of Privately Owned Protected Areas

BioScience , Volume 51 (12) – Dec 1, 2001

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/perils-and-promise-of-privately-owned-protected-areas-tAQWhwG43G

References (55)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Published by Oxford University Press.
Subject
Departments
ISSN
0006-3568
eISSN
1525-3244
DOI
10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[1079:PAPOPO]2.0.CO;2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Forum Perils and Promise of Privately Owned Protected Areas JEFFREY A. LANGHOLZ AND JAMES P. LASSOIE overnments have long been the principal force THIS ARTICLE REVIEWS THE CURRENT Gbehind the establishment of protected areas worldwide. The quality of governmental protection, however, has often STATE OF KNOWLEDGE REGARDING proven inadequate, with many parks existing only on paper (Van Schaik et al. 1997, IUCN 1999). Even if publicly owned PRIVATELY OWNED PARKS WORLDWIDE, parks were well protected, more than 93% of the Earth’s land area and most of its biodiversity would still remain vulnera- EMPHASIZING THEIR CURRENT STATUS, ble (WRI et al. 1998). Given ongoing habitat destruction, es- VARIOUS TYPES, AND PRINCIPAL pecially in the tropics (World Bank 1998), it is imperative that the conservation community develop additional approaches STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES for in situ biodiversity protection. Privately owned protected areas have emerged as one option. Private parks are prolifer- ating throughout much of the world, yet little is known about them. Research has begun to address private parks, but only The rise of modern private parks indirectly (Sayer 1991, Schelhas and Greenberg 1993). A few Privately owned protected areas have existed in various forms case studies highlighting various aspects of

Journal

BioScienceOxford University Press

Published: Dec 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.