Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Jordal (2008)
Benchmarking of power cycles with CO2 capture—The impact of the selected frameworkInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2
J. Davison (2007)
Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2Energy, 32
(2009)
Techno-Economic Evaluations and Benchmarking of Precombustion CO 2 Capture and Oxy-fuel Processes Developed in the
K. Damen, M. Troost, A. Faaij, W. Turkenburg (2006)
A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologiesProgress in Energy and Combustion Science, 32
Richard Brown, H. Campbell (2003)
Benefit-Cost Analysis: Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets
O. Maurstad, H. Herzog, O. Bolland, J. Beér (2006)
Impact of coal quality and gasifier technology on IGCC performance
P. Campbell, J. Mcmullan, B. Williams (2000)
Concept for a competitive coal fired integrated gasification combined cycle power plantFuel, 79
R. Doctor, J. Molburg, P. Thimmapuram, G. Berry, C. Livengood, R. Johnson (1993)
Gasification combined cycle: Carbon dioxide recovery, transport, and disposal☆Energy Conversion and Management, 34
L. Nord, R. Anantharaman, O. Bolland (2009)
Design and off-design analyses of a pre-combustion CO2 capture process in a natural gas combined cycle power plantInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3
(2012)
Monte Carlo simulation of investment integrity and value for power-lants with carbon-capture
E. Rubin, A. Rao, Chao Chen (2005)
Comparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage, 1
Anamaria Padurean, C. Cormos, P. Agachi (2012)
Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas-liquid absorption for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plantsInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 7
I. Ertesvåg, H. Kvamsdal, O. Bolland (2005)
Exergy analysis of a gas-turbine combined-cycle power plant with precombustion CO2 captureEnergy, 30
Pre-combustion carbon-capture technologies
M. Ameri, P. Ahmadi, S. Khanmohammadi (2008)
Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power plantInternational Journal of Energy Research, 32
R. Gabbrielli, Riti Singh (2005)
Economic and Scenario Analyses of New Gas Turbine Combined Cycles With No Emissions of Carbon DioxideJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme, 127
H. Avval, Pouria Ahmadi, Ahmadreza Ghaffarizadeh, M. Saidi (2011)
Thermo‐economic‐environmental multiobjective optimization of a gas turbine power plant with preheater using evolutionary algorithmInternational Journal of Energy Research, 35
P. Freund (1996)
The IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D programmeEnergy Conversion and Management, 37
(2009)
Effect of supplementary fi ring options on cycle performance and CO 2 emissions of an IGCC power generation sys
Heng-Chi Liu, W. Ni, Zheng Li, Linwei Ma (2008)
Strategic thinking on IGCC development in ChinaEnergy Policy, 36
O. Bolland, I. Ertesvåg, Daniel Speich (2000)
Exergy analysis of gas-turbine combined cycle with CO2 capture using auto-thermal reforming of natural gas
P. Pak, Young Lee, K. Ahn (2010)
Comprehensive evaluation of a CO2‐capturing high‐efficiency power generation system for utilizing waste heat from factoriesInternational Journal of Energy Research, 34
J. Mondol, D. Mcilveen-Wright, S. Rezvani, Ye Huang, N. Hewitt (2009)
Techno-economic evaluation of advanced IGCC lignite coal fuelled power plants with CO2 captureFuel, 88
G. Lorenzo, P. Pilidis, J. Witton, D. Probert (2012)
Monte-Carlo simulation of investment integrity and value for power-plants with carbon-captureApplied Energy, 98
M. Romano, P. Chiesa, G. Lozza (2010)
Pre-combustion CO2 capture from natural gas power plants, with ATR and MDEA processesInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4
C. Cormos, A. Cormos, P. Agachi (2011)
Techno-economical and environmental evaluations of IGCC power generation process with carbon capture and storage (CCS)Computer-aided chemical engineering, 29
P. Ahmadi, M. Rosen, I. Dincer (2011)
Greenhouse gas emission and exergo-environmental analyses of a trigeneration energy systemInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5
B. Carsberg (1974)
Analysis for investment decisions
H. Shim, W. Chun, Hyungtaek Kim (2010)
Comparative simulation of hydrogen production derived from gasification system with CO2 reduction by various feedstocksInternational Journal of Energy Research, 34
R. O'Hayre (2005)
Fuel Cell Fundamentals
G. Lozza, P. Chiesa (2000)
Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles: Part A — Partial Oxidation
Baoqun Wang, Hongguang Jin, D. Zheng (2004)
Recovery of CO2 with MEA and K2CO3 absorption in the IGCC systemInternational Journal of Energy Research, 28
(2005)
Coproduction of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions
Available from: www. mckinsey.com/clientservice/ccsi
Costas Christou, Ioannis Hadjipaschalis, A. Poullikkas (2008)
Assessment of integrated gasification combined cycle technology competitivenessRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12
A. Corradetti, U. Desideri (2005)
Analysis of Gas-Steam Combined Cycles With Natural Gas Reforming and CO2 CaptureJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme, 127
S. Rezvani, Ye Huang, D. Mcilveen-Wright, N. Hewitt, J. Mondol (2009)
Comparative assessment of coal fired IGCC systems with CO2 capture using physical absorption, membrane reactors and chemical loopingFuel, 88
P. Chiesa, S. Consonni, G. Lozza (1999)
A comparative analysis of IGCCs with CO2 sequestration
L. Eide, D. Bailey (2005)
Precombustion Decarbonisation Processes
G. Lorenzo, P. Pilidis, J. Witton, D. Probert (2012)
A Framework for the Evaluation of Investments in Clean Power-TechnologiesComputer-aided chemical engineering, 30
N. Gnanapragasam, B. Reddy, M. Rosen (2009)
Effect of supplementary firing options on cycle performance and CO2 emissions of an IGCC power generation systemInternational Journal of Energy Research, 33
(1999)
Key Components for CO2 Abatement: Gas Turbines
(2000)
Economical Assessment of natural gas fired combined cycle power plant with CO2 gas fired combined cycle power plant with CO2 capture and sequestration
J. Kotowicz, A. Skorek-Osikowska, Ł. Bartela (2011)
Economic and environmental evaluation of selected advanced power generation technologiesProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 225
L. Nord, A. Kothandaraman, O. Bolland, H. Herzog, Gregory McRae (2009)
A modeling software linking approach for the analysis of an integrated reforming combined cycle with hot potassium carbonate CO[subscript 2] capture
P. Pak, Young Lee, K. Ahn (2010)
Characteristic evaluation of a CO2‐capturing repowering system based on oxy‐fuel combustion and exergetic flow analyses for improving efficiencyInternational Journal of Energy Research, 34
G. Lozza, P. Chiesa (2002)
Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles—Part II: Steam-Methane ReformingJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme, 124
(2006)
The methodology used for estimating the costs of CCS
P. Chiesa, S. Consonni, T. Kreutz, R. Williams (2005)
Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissionsInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 30
P. Chiesa, G. Lozza, L. Mazzocchi (2003)
Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine FuelJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme, 127
(2002)
Advanced Fossil Power Systems Comparison Study
(2007)
Modelling investment risks and uncertainties with real options approach. International Energy Agency
M. Amelio, P. Morrone, F. Gallucci, A. Basile (2007)
Integrated gasification gas combined cycle plant with membrane reactors: Technological and economical analysisEnergy Conversion and Management, 48
(2007)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The future of coal options for a carbonconstrained world
B. Hoffmann, A. Szklo (2011)
Integrated gasification combined cycle and carbon capture: A risky option to mitigate CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plantsApplied Energy, 88
P. Ahmadi, I. Dincer (2011)
Thermodynamic and exergoenvironmental analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a gas turbine power plantApplied Thermal Engineering, 31
Gang Xu, Hongguang Jin, Yongping Yang, Yujie Xu, Hu Lin, Liqiang Duan (2010)
A comprehensive techno‐economic analysis method for power generation systems with CO2 captureInternational Journal of Energy Research, 34
L. Nord, Bo Gong, O. Bolland, G. McRae (2010)
Incorporation of uncertainty analysis in modeling of integrated reforming combined cycleEnergy Conversion and Management, 51
(2008)
Advanced low carbon power systems: evaluation of an auto-thermal reforming combined cycle
(2008)
Energy Technology Section
L. Nord, R. Anantharaman, M. Rausand, O. Bolland (2009)
A qualitative reliability and operability analysis of an integrated reforming combined cycle plant with CO2 captureInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3
(2008)
Exergy analysis of a 420MW combined cycle power plant
(2002)
Evaluation of Fossil Fuel Power Plants with CO2 Recovery
G. Ordorica-garcia, P. Douglas, E. Croiset, Ligang Zheng (2006)
Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidanceEnergy Conversion and Management, 47
Chao Chen, E. Rubin (2009)
CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and costEnergy Policy, 37
C. Ekström, F. Schwendig, O. Biede, F.J.G. Franco, G. Haupt, G. Koeijer, C. Papapavlou, Petter Røkke (2009)
Techno-Economic Evaluations and Benchmarking of Pre-combustion CO2 Capture and Oxy-fuel Processes Developed in the European ENCAP ProjectEnergy Procedia, 1
H. Khatib (2014)
Economic evaluation of projects in the electricity supply industry
(2007)
Modelling investment risks and uncertainties with real options approach
E. Martelli, L. Nord, O. Bolland (2012)
Design criteria and optimization of heat recovery steam cycles for integrated reforming combined cycles with CO2 captureApplied Energy, 92
Aie (2005)
World Energy Outlook 2005
Ming Yang, W. Blyth (2007)
Modeling Investment Risks and Uncertainties with Real Options Approach
(2008)
Advanced low carbon power systems: evaluation of an integrated gasification combined cycle
M. Ghadiri, A. Marjani, S. Shirazian (2013)
Mathematical modeling and simulation of CO2 stripping from monoethanolamine solution using nano porous membrane contactorsInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 13
SUMMARY An engineering‐economic analysis of the behaviours of each of two pre‐combustion gas‐turbine combined cycles with CO2 capture (an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) and an Integrated Reforming Combined Cycle (IRCC)) is described. Their economic performances have been evaluated in terms of the break‐even electricity selling price. The results show that the proposed pre‐combustion power plant efficiency values (37% and 43.7% for the IGCC and the IRCC respectively) are significantly lower compared to a conventional plant value (55.3%). The CO2 emissions of the latter are less than half those of the conventional plant. Introducing an hypothetical carbon tax equal to 50£/tCO2, the break‐even selling price (BESP) for the proposed IGCC and IRCC plants is 4.40 p/kWh and 4.10 p/kWh respectively, while for the conventional plant amounts to 4.73 p/kWh. A sensitivity analysis has been carried out by varying the most influential investment parameters. The analysis has revealed that, considering the uncertainties associated with these key parameters, a substantial risk that the BESP could exceed the first value obtained is so prominent in some cases to alter their ranking order with respect to the most competitive technology. The final part of the analysis is a Monte‐Carlo simulation to determine the impact of simultaneous variations of all the variables, subject to uncertainty, on the break‐even selling unit price for the generated electricity. From the simulation, it derives that the BESP value ranges from 3.13 p/kWh to over 6.00 p/kWh for the IGCC case with a 50% probability of exceeding the first value obtained (4.40 p/kWh). In the IRCC case, the range of possible value for the BESP is from 2.85 p/kWh to 6.10 p/kWh, and there is a 60% probability that the actual BESP would exceed the first value obtained (4.10 p/kWh). Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journal of Energy Research – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.