Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

ASSET REDEPLOYMENT, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE STRATEGY IN DECLINING INDUSTRIES

ASSET REDEPLOYMENT, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE STRATEGY IN DECLINING INDUSTRIES The resource‐based perspective suggests that firms are bundles of assets, some of which are fungible in nature. To the extent that some resources are fungible, firms should be able to redeploy them to enter new markets when their existing businesses decline. On the other hand, perspectives that emphasize the business‐specific nature of routines or managerial skills point to inherent risks in organizational transformation. In a declining market, resources can be redeployed within the firm through diversification‐oriented acquisitions, or they can be redeployed through market mechanisms through consolidation‐oriented acquisitions. In this paper, we examine the differences in performance outcomes between diversification‐oriented acquisitions and consolidation‐oriented acquisitions in industries within the defense sector, which have experienced significant decline. Our results indicate that consolidation‐oriented acquisitions outperform diversification‐oriented acquisitions in the decline phase of their industries in terms of both ex ante (stock market based) and ex post (operating) performance measures. At the corporate level, we find a positive relationship between focus and Tobin’s q, even when the industry is in decline. The implication of our results is that assets from declining industries are redeployed more effectively through market mechanisms than within the firm through the acquisition of complementary assets. ©1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Strategic Management Journal Wiley

ASSET REDEPLOYMENT, ACQUISITIONS AND CORPORATE STRATEGY IN DECLINING INDUSTRIES

Strategic Management Journal , Volume 18 (S1) – Jul 1, 1997

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/asset-redeployment-acquisitions-and-corporate-strategy-in-declining-ssBJkS0ztC

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN
0143-2095
eISSN
1097-0266
DOI
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<99::AID-SMJ928>3.0.CO;2-B
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The resource‐based perspective suggests that firms are bundles of assets, some of which are fungible in nature. To the extent that some resources are fungible, firms should be able to redeploy them to enter new markets when their existing businesses decline. On the other hand, perspectives that emphasize the business‐specific nature of routines or managerial skills point to inherent risks in organizational transformation. In a declining market, resources can be redeployed within the firm through diversification‐oriented acquisitions, or they can be redeployed through market mechanisms through consolidation‐oriented acquisitions. In this paper, we examine the differences in performance outcomes between diversification‐oriented acquisitions and consolidation‐oriented acquisitions in industries within the defense sector, which have experienced significant decline. Our results indicate that consolidation‐oriented acquisitions outperform diversification‐oriented acquisitions in the decline phase of their industries in terms of both ex ante (stock market based) and ex post (operating) performance measures. At the corporate level, we find a positive relationship between focus and Tobin’s q, even when the industry is in decline. The implication of our results is that assets from declining industries are redeployed more effectively through market mechanisms than within the firm through the acquisition of complementary assets. ©1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal

Strategic Management JournalWiley

Published: Jul 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.