Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/evaluating-the-finance-journals-the-department-chairperson-s-s6kxzm6P83
References (1)
-
Coe Coe, Weinstock Weinstock (1969)
“Evaluating Journal Publication: Perceptions Versus Reality.”AACSB Bulletin, Vol. 6
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- © The Southern Finance Association and the Southwestern Finance Association
- ISSN
- 0270-2592
- eISSN
- 1475-6803
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1983.tb00344.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Finance department chairpersons report that the role of published research is more important than ever in influencing appointment and promotion decisions of finance professors. This study and one conducted 15 years ago focus on the pivotal role of finance chairpersons in the evaluation of their faculties' journal publications. These studies show that the major factor influencing the finance chairpersons' evaluations of publications is the journal in which an article is published. Journals of high merit are perceived to have low acceptance rates and vice versa. These estimates of perceived acceptance rates are not correlated with actual acceptance rates. Because perceived acceptance rates play a key role in evaluating faculty publications, there is a need for finance chairpersons to know the relative difficulties of publishing in leading finance and related journals.
Journal
The Journal of Financial Research – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 1983