Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Olson Olson (1996)
Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations are Rich, and Others PoorJournal of Economic Perspectives, 10
Anderson Anderson, Marcouiller Marcouiller (2002)
Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigationReview of Economics and Statistics, 84
Frankel Frankel, Rose Rose (2002)
An Estimate of the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade and IncomeQuarterly Journal of Economics
Beugelsdijk Beugelsdijk, Schaik Schaik (2001)
Cultuur en economieTijdschrift voor Politieke Ekonomie, 23
Den Butter Den Butter, Mosch Mosch (2002)
Het belang van vertrouwen in de internationale handel: een empirische verkenningMaandschrift Economie, 66
Rauch Rauch (2001)
Business and Social Networks in International TradeJournal of Economic Literature, 39
Sala‐i‐Martin Sala‐i‐Martin (1997)
I Just Ran Two Million RegressionsThe American Economic Review, 87
Knack Knack, Keefer Keefer (1995)
Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross‐Country Tests Using Alternative MeasuresEconomics and Politics, 7
McCallum McCallum (1995)
National Borders Matter: Canada‐U.S. Regional Trade PatternsAmerican Economic Review, 85
Frankel Frankel, Romer Romer (1999)
Does Trade Cause Growth?American Economic Review
Knack Knack, Keefer Keefer (1997)
Does Social Capital have an Economic Payoff? A Cross‐Country InvestigationQuarterly Journal of Economics, 112
Hall Hall, Jones Jones (1999)
Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114
Summary This paper studies the effect of institutions on trade flows, using a gravity model approach. Standard gravity equations incorporate factors such as geographical proximity, language, trade policy and common history as explanatory factors for variation in bilateral trade that reflect the costs of trade across geographical and cultural distance. We extend this type of analysis by focusing on the relevance of the quality of governance and the extent of familiarity with the resulting framework of rules and norms in explaining variation in bilateral trade patterns. More specifically, we test whether institutional homogeneity and institutional quality have an independent impact on the trade volume between pairs of countries. We find that having a similar institutional framework promotes bilateral trade by 13%, on average. Furthermore, a better quality of formal institutions tends to coincide with more trade. Depending on being either importer or exporter, an increase in overall institutional quality of one standard deviation from the mean leads to an estimated increase of 30–44% in bilateral trade.
Kyklos International Review of Social Sciences – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.