Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Bell (1971)
A grazing ecosystem in the SerengetiScientific American, 225
S. Pimm (1992)
The Balance of Nature?: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities
R. Peters (1983)
The Ecological Implications of Body Size
J. Fryxell, J. Greever, A. Sinclair (1988)
Why are Migratory Ungulates So Abundant?The American Naturalist, 131
Samuel McNaughton (1990)
Mineral nutrition and seasonal movements of African migratory ungulatesNature, 345
C. Moser, G. Kalton (1958)
Survey Methods in Social Investigation
M. Kinnaird (1992)
Competition for a Forest Palm: Use of Phoenix reclinata by Human and Nonhuman PrimatesConservation Biology, 6
W. Newmark, N. Leonard, Hashim Sariko, D. Gamassa (1993)
Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in TanzaniaBiological Conservation, 63
A. Kiss (1990)
Living with wildlife
R. Bell (1982)
The Effect of Soil Nutrient Availability on Community Structure in African Ecosystems
A questionnaire survey was conducted in Tanzania of 1396 local people living adjacent to Arusha, Kilimanjaro, Tarangire, Lake Manyara, and Mikumi National Parks and the Selous Game Reserve. Over 71% of local people surveyed reported problems with wildlife. The relative frequency of reported conflict with wildlife was significantly and inversely related to human density on lands adjacent to a protected area. Of those local people who reported having problems with wildlife, 86% reported crop damage, while 10% reported the killing of livestock and poultry. The problematic wildlife species also varied significantly with human density. Large animals were more problematic at low human densities, while small animals were more problematic at high human densities. Local people were generally less effective in controlling small‐bodied species than large‐bodied species. The relative frequency of reported success in controlling wildlife varied significantly with human density and was bimodal: local people were less effective in controlling wildlife at lower and higher human densities. This bimodal relationship suggests that, even if all protected areas in Tanzania were abolished, local people would continue to experience problems with wildlife at high human densities. To minimize the conflict between wildlife and local people, land uses associated with low human density that are non‐attractive to wildlife should be encouraged on lands adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania.
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.