Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R Holmes, V Mooney, R Bucholz (1984)
A coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substituteClin Orthop, 188
D. Cottrell, L. Wolford (1998)
Long-term evaluation of the use of coralline hydroxyapatite in orthognathic surgery.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 56 8
M. Deeb, M. Roszkowski (1988)
Hydroxylapatite granules and blocks as an extracranial augmenting material in rhesus monkeys.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 46 1
DF Williams (1987)
Implant materials in biofunction
K. Wiese, H. Merten (1993)
The role of the periosteum in osteointegration of hydroxyapatite granules.International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 22 5
E. White, E. Shors (1986)
Biomaterial aspects of Interpore-200 porous hydroxyapatite.Dental clinics of North America, 30 1
Ian Jackson, R. Yavuzer (2000)
Hydroxyapatite cement: an alternative for craniofacial skeletal contour refinements.British journal of plastic surgery, 53 1
P. Hobar, M. Pantaloni, H. Byrd (2000)
Porous hydroxyapatite granules for alloplastic enhancement of the facial region.Clinics in plastic surgery, 27 4
(2012)
Barbosa MA (ed) Biomaterial degradation
Elisabeth Elsinger, Luis Leal (1996)
Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes.The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 35 5
P. Couvreur (1989)
Implant Materials in Biofunction: Advances in Biomaterials 8, Editors: C. de Putter, G.L. Lange, K. de Groot and A.J.C. Lee Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, pp 522, DFL 365.00Biomaterials, 10
John Kent, M. Zide, John Kay, M. Jarcho (1986)
Hydroxylapatite blocks and particles as bone graft substitutes in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 44 8
JF Osborn (1991)
Biomaterial degradation
S. Pollick, E. Shors, R. Holmes, R. Kraut (1995)
Bone formation and implant degradation of coralline porous ceramics placed in bone and ectopic sites.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 53 8
S. Wolfe (1982)
Autogenous bone grafts versus alloplastic material in maxillofacial surgery.Clinics in plastic surgery, 9 4
M. Jarcho, J. Kay, Gumaer Ki, R. Doremus, Drobeck Hp (1977)
Tissue, cellular and subcellular events at a bone-ceramic hydroxylapatite interface.Journal of bioengineering, 1 2
K. Fukuta, Y. Har-Shai, M. Collares, Jason Lichten, Ian Jackson (1992)
Comparison of Inorganic Bovine Bone Mineral Particles with Porous Hydroxyapatite Granules and Cranial Bone Dust in the Reconstruction of Full‐thickness Skull DefectJournal of Craniofacial Surgery, 3
FW Bains, FP Elia (1996)
Recent advances in plastic surgery, vol. 5
I. Jackson, R. Nellen (1986)
The “pocket” method of onlay bone graftingChirurgia plastica, 8
G. Pettis, L. Kaban, J. Glowacki (1990)
Tissue response to composite ceramic hydroxyapatite/demineralized bone implants.Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 48 10
H. Rosen, M. McFarland (1990)
The Biologic Behavior of Hydroxyapatite Implanted into the Maxillofacial SkeletonPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 85
H. Byrd, P. Hobar, K. Shewmake, Daniel Marchac (1993)
Augmentation of the Craniofacial Skeleton with Porous Hydroxyapatite GranulesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 91
Ralph Holmes, Vert Mooney, R. Bucholz, Allan Tencer (1984)
A coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute. Preliminary report.Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 188
(1987)
Consensus and definitions in biomaterials
Augmentation of the craniomaxillofacial region is required for many esthetic and reconstructive procedures. Although a variety of different materials and techniques have been described, coral-derived hydroxyapatite granules (HA), which are biocompatible with bone, seem to be the ideal material. In the past 25 years, we have observed HA granules to be a safe, stable, easy to use, and cost-effective material that can provide the exact shape and size of the area to be augmented. Complications are few, and the technique is simple and quick. This study is an update of our previous articles studying HA granules as an augmentation and reconstructive material. This material has been proven to be an effective tool in facial cosmetic and reconstructive surgery.
European Journal of Plastic Surgery – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.