Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kaplan (1977)
Patterns of fight interference in free-ranging rhesus monkeysAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 47
B. Thierry (1985)
Patterns of agonistic interactions in three species of macaque (Macaca mulatta, M. fascicularis, M. tonkeana)Aggressive Behavior, 11
(1987)
Preliminary comments on pairing unfamiliar adult female rhesus monkeys for the purpose of environmental enrichment
L. Fairbanks, M. Mcguire, W. Kerber (1978)
Effects of Group Size, Composition, Introduction Technique and Cage Apparatus on Aggression during Group Formation in Rhesus MonkeysPsychological Reports, 42
A. Maslow (1936)
The Role of Dominance in the Social and Sexual Behavior of Infra-Human Primates : IV. The Determination of Hierarchy in Pairs and in a GroupJournal of Genetic Psychology, 49
J. Teas, H. Feldman, T. Richie, H. Taylor, C. Southwick (1982)
Aggressive behavior in the free-ranging rhesus monkeys of kathmandu, nepalAggressive Behavior, 8
Envin Envin, Maple Maple, Willott Willott, Mitchell Mitchell (1974)
Persistent peer attachments of rhesus monkeys—Responses to reunion after two years of separationPsychological Reports, 34
J. Kaplan (1978)
Fight interference and altruism in rhesus monkeysAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 49
(1974)
Persistent peer attachments of rhesus monkeys-Responses to reunion after two years of separation. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS 34:1179-1183,1974
D. Lindburg (1971)
The Rhesus Monkey in North India: An Ecological and Behavioral Study*
I. Bernstein, C. Ehardt (1985)
Agonistic aiding: Kinship, rank, age, and sex influencesAmerican Journal of Primatology, 8
Line Sw (1987)
Environmental enrichment for laboratory primates.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 190 7
(1987)
Preliminary comments on environmental enrichment with branches for individually caged rhesus monkeys
An attempt was made to socialize unrelated and unfamiliar adult rhesus monkey females that had lived in single cages for more than one year. Partners first were given the opportunity for noncontact familiarization in partitioned double cages. They were then transferred into an ordinary double cage. Clear‐cut rank relationships were evident within the first 90 minutes of pair formation in 94% (17/18) of dyads tested. Only 28% (5/18) of pairs resorted to fighting (in no case with infliction of serious injury), while 50% (9/18) engaged in social grooming or hugging during this initial phase of pair formation. Eighty‐three percent (15/18) of pairs were compatible, with none of the partners showing signs of depression and none inflicting serious injury on the other. Seventeen percent (3/18) of pairs were incompatible (two cases of depression, one serious tail injury) and were separated. It was concluded that the barren environment of singly caged rhesus monkey females can be enriched with little risk by carefully making them compatible companions.
American Journal of Primatology – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1988
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.