Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Brav Brav, Heaton Heaton (2002)
Competing Theories of Financial AnomaliesReview of Financial Studies, 15
Black Black (1986)
NoiseJournal of Finance, 41
Blume Blume, Friend Friend (1973)
A New Look at the Capital Asset Pricing ModelJournal of Finance, 28
Bloomfield Bloomfield, Michaely Michaely (2004)
Risk or Mispricing? From the Mouths of ProfessionalsFinancial Management, 33
Fama Fama, French French (1992)
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 47
Fama Fama, French French (1993)
Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and BondsJournal of Financial Economics, 33
Froot Froot, Frankel Frankel (1989)
Forward Discount Bias: Is it an Exchange Risk PremiumQuarterly Journal of Economics, 104
Jegadeesh Jegadeesh, Kim Kim, Krische Krische, Lee Lee (2004)
Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add ValueJournal of Finance, 59
Sharpe Sharpe (1978)
New Evidence on the Capital Asset Pricing Model: DiscussionJournal of Finance, 33
Davis Davis, Fama Fama, French French (2000)
Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929–1997Journal of Finance,, 55
Merton Merton (1973)
An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing ModelEconometrica, 41
Fama Fama, MacBeth MacBeth (1973)
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical TestsJournal of Political Economy, 81
Womack Womack (1996)
Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations have Investment ValueJournal of Finance, 51
Claus Claus, Thomas Thomas (2001)
The Equity Risk Premium is Much Lower than You Think It Is: Empirical Estimates from a New ApproachJournal of Finance, 56
Froot Froot (1989)
New Hope for the Expectations Hypothesis of the Term Structure of Iinterest RatesJournal of Finance, 44
Kothari Kothari, Shanken Shanken, Sloan Sloan (1995)
Another Look at the Cross Section of Expected Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 50
Blume Blume, Easley Easley (1982)
Learning to be RationalJournal of Economic Theory, 26
Fama Fama, French French (2001)
The Equity PremiumJournal of Finance, 57
Black Black (1972)
Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted BorrowingJournal of Business, 45
Elton Elton (1999)
Expected Return, Realized Return, and Asset Pricing TestsJournal of Finance, 54
Rajan Rajan, Servaes Servaes (1997)
Analyst Following of Initial Public OfferingsJournal of Finance, 52
Jegadeesh Jegadeesh, Titman Titman (1993)
Returns for Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market EfficiencyJournal of Finance, 48
Friend Friend, Westerfield Westerfield, Granito Granito (1978)
New Evidence on the Capital Asset Pricing ModelPapers and Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting American Finance Association, Journal of Finance, 33
Michaely Michaely, Womack Womack (1999)
Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst RecommendationsReview of Financial Studies, 12
Welch Welch (2000)
Views of Financial Economists on the Equity Premium and on Professional ControversiesJournal of Business, 73
Bondt Bondt, Thaler Thaler (1987)
Further Evidence of Investor OverreactionThe Journal of Finance, 42
Sharpe Sharpe (1964)
Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of RiskJournal of Finance, 19
Jagannathan Jagannathan, Wang Wang (1996)
The Conditional CAPM and Cross‐Section of Expected ReturnsJournal of Finance, 51
Reinganum Reinganum (1981)
Misspecification of Capital AssetPricing: Empirical Anomalies based on Earnings Yield and Market ValueJournal of Financial Economics, 9
Carhart Carhart (1997)
On Persistence in Mutual Fund PerformanceJournal of Finance, 52
Huberman Huberman, Kandel Kandel (1990)
Market Efficiency and Value Line's RecordJournal of Business, 63
Banz (1981)
The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common StocksJournal of Financial Economics, 9
Barber Barber, Lehavy Lehavy, McNichols McNichols, Trueman Trueman (2001)
Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 56
Gebhardt Gebhardt, Lee Lee, Swaminathan Swaminathan (2001)
Toward an Implied Cost‐of‐CapitalJournal of Accounting Research, 39
Lewellen Lewellen, Shanken Shanken (2002)
Learning, Asset Pricing Tests, and Market EfficiencyJournal of Finance, 57
Harris Harris, Marston Marston, Mishra Mishra, O'Brien O'Brien (2003)
Ex Ante Cost of Equity Estimates of S&P 500 Firms and Global vs Domestic CAPMFinancial Management, 32
Reisman Reisman (1992)
Reference Variables, Factor Structure, and the Multibeta RepresentationJournal of Finance, 47
Botosan Botosan, Plumlee Plumlee (2005)
Assessing Alternative Proxies for the Expected Risk PremiumAccounting Review, 80
Graham Graham, Harvey Harvey (2001)
The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the FieldJournal of Financial Economics, 60
Affleck-Graves (1992)
The Relation between the Value Line Enigma and the Post Earnings-Announcement DriftJournal of Financial Economics, 31
Jagannathan Jagannathan, McGrattan McGrattan, Scherbina Scherbina (2000)
The Declining US Equity PremiumQuarterly Review, 24
Rouwenhorst Rouwenhorst (1998)
International Momentum StrategiesJournal of Finance, 53
Ang (1985)
Return, Risk, and Yield: Evidence from Ex Ante DataJournal of Finance, 40
Bondt Bondt, Thaler Thaler (1985)
Does the Stock Market OverreactJournal of Finance, 40
Lintner Lintner (1965)
The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital BudgetsReview of Economics and Statistics, 47
Pontiff Pontiff (1996)
Costly Arbitrage: Evidence from Closed End FundsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 111
Asset pricing models generate predictions relating assets' expected rates of return and their risk attributes. Most tests of these models have employed realized rates of return as a proxy for expected return. We use analysts' expected rates of return to examine the relation between these expectations and firm attributes. By assuming that analysts' expectations are unbiased estimates of market‐wide expected rates of return, we can circumvent the use of realized rates of return and provide evidence on the predictions emanating from traditional asset pricing models. We find a positive, robust relation between expected return and market beta and a negative relation between expected return and firm size, consistent with the notion that these are risk factors. We do not find that high book‐to‐market firms are expected to earn higher returns than low book‐to‐market firms, inconsistent with the notion that book‐to‐market is a risk factor.
Financial Management – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.