Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Keith Hattrup, J. Rock, Christine Scalia (1997)
The effects of varying conceptualizations of job performance on adverse impact, minority hiring, and predicted performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 82
N. Schmitt, W. Rogers, D. Chan, L. Sheppard, D. Jennings (1997)
Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinationsJournal of Applied Psychology, 82
Huffcutt Huffcutt, Roth Roth (1998)
Racial group differences in interview evaluationsJournal of Applied Psychology, 83
J. Ford, K. Kraiger, Suzanne Schechtman (1986)
Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria.Psychological Bulletin, 99
N. Schmitt, R. Gooding, R. Noe, Michael Kirsch (1984)
METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICSPersonnel Psychology, 37
C. Hoffman, G. Thornton (1997)
EXAMINING SELECTION UTILITY WHERE COMPETING PREDICTORS DIFFER IN ADVERSE IMPACTPersonnel Psychology, 50
L. Gottfredson (1988)
Reconsidering fairness: A matter of social and ethical prioritiesJournal of Vocational Behavior, 33
Mael Mael (1991)
A conceptual rationale for the domain and attributes of biodata itemsPersonnel Psychology, 44
Tett Tett, Jackson Jackson, Rothstein Rothstein (1991)
Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta‐analytic reviewPersonnel Psychology, 44
Auralee Childs, R. Klimoski (1986)
Successfully predicting career success: An application of the biographical inventory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71
Ryan Ryan, Ployhart Ployhart, Friedel Friedel (1998)
Using personality testing to reduce adverse impact: A cautionary noteJournal of Applied Psychology, 83
R. Reilly, Georgia Chao (1982)
VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURESPersonnel Psychology, 35
Wiesner Wiesner, Cronshaw Cronshaw (1988)
The moderating impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interviewJournal of Occupational Psychology, 61
A. Dalessio, T. Silverhart (1994)
COMBINING BIODATA TEST AND INTERVIEW INFORMATION: PREDICTING DECISIONS AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIAPersonnel Psychology, 47
Murphy Murphy, Shiarella Shiarella (1997)
Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: Multivariate frameworks for studying test validityPersonnel Psychology, 50
E. Pulakos, N. Schmitt (1996)
An Evaluation of Two Strategies for Reducing Adverse Impact and Their Effects on Criterion-Related ValidityHuman Performance, 9
F. Schmidt, J. Hunter (1998)
The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.Psychological Bulletin, 124
C. Smith, D. Organ, J. Near (1983)
ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: ITS NATURE AND ANTECEDENTSJournal of Applied Psychology, 68
Allen Huffcutt, P. Roth (1998)
Racial Group Differences in Employment Interview EvaluationsJournal of Applied Psychology, 83
Murray Barrick, M. Mount (1991)
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 44
D. Ones, C. Viswesvaran (1998)
Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Results across four large-scale job applicant datasets.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83
Amy Kristof (1996)
PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONSPersonnel Psychology, 49
W. Wiesner, Steven Cronshaw (1988)
A meta‐analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview*Journal of occupational psychology, 61
Mount Mount, Barrick Barrick (1995)
The Big Five personality dimensions: Implications for research and practice in human resources managementResearch in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13
B. Brown, M. Campion (1994)
Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters' perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
Jeffrey Mchenry, L. Hough, J. Toquam, M. Hanson, Steven Ashworth (1990)
PROJECT A VALIDITY RESULTS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PREDICTOR AND CRITERION DOMAINSPersonnel Psychology, 43
E. Pulakos, N. Schmitt (1995)
Experience-based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity.Personnel Psychology, 48
Allen Huffcutt, P. Roth, Michael McDaniel (1996)
A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 81
Michael McDaniel, Deborah Whetzel, F. Schmidt, Steven Maurer (1994)
The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
J. Conway, Gina Peneno (1999)
Comparing Structured Interview Question Types: Construct Validity and Applicant ReactionsJournal of Business and Psychology, 13
P. Sackett, Cathy Dubois, Ann Noe (1991)
Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76
P. Roth, P. Bobko (1997)
A research agenda for muti-attribute utility analysis in human resource managementHuman Resource Management Review, 7
D. Waldman, B. Avolio (1991)
Race effects in performance evaluations: Controlling for ability, education, and experience.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76
P. Sackett, Jill Ellingson (1997)
THE EFFECTS OF FORMING MULTI‐PREDICTOR COMPOSITES ON GROUP DIFFERENCES AND ADVERSE IMPACTPersonnel Psychology, 50
P. Wright, Philip Lichtenfels, E. Pursell (1989)
The structured interview: Additional studies and a meta‐analysisJournal of occupational psychology, 62
H. Rothstein, F. Schmidt, F. Erwin, W. Owens, C. Sparks (1990)
Biographical Data in Employment Selection: Can Validities Be Made Generalizable?Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
Allen Huffcutt, W. Arthur (1994)
Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
J. Wanous, S. Sullivan, J. Malinak (1989)
The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
Sackett Sackett, Roth Roth (1996)
Multi‐stage selection strategies: A Monte Carlo investigation of effects on performance and minority hiringPersonnel Psychology, 49
J. Hunter, Ronda Hunter (1984)
Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job PerformancePsychological Bulletin, 96
Robert Ployhart, Ann Ryan (1998)
Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement.The Journal of applied psychology, 83 1
K. Murphy, Ann Shiarella (1997)
Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests
C. Viswesvaran, D. Ones (1995)
Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modelingPersonnel Psychology, 48
A variety of recent articles in the personnel selection literature have used analyses of meta‐analytically derived matrices to draw general conclusions for the field. The purpose of this article is to construct a matrix that incorporates as complete information as possible on the relationships among cognitive ability measures, three sets of alternative predictors, and job performance, We build upon a starting matrix used by Schmitt, Rodgers, Chan, Sheppard, and Jennings (1997). Mean differences, by race, for each of the measures and the potential for adverse impact of predictor composites are also considered. We demonstrate that the use of alternative predictors alone to predict job performance (in the absence of cognitive ability) lowers the potential for adverse impact. However, in contrast to recent claims, adverse impact continues to occur at many commonly used selection ratios. Future researchers are encouraged to use our matrix and to expand upon it as new primary research becomes available. We also report and reaffirm many methodological lessons along the way, including the many judgment calls that appear in an effort of this magnitude and a reminder that the field could benefit from even greater conceptual care regarding what is labeled an “alternative predictor.” Directions for future meta‐analyses and for future primary research activities are also derived.
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1999
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.