Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Smith, R. Wuerker, K. Frank (1967)
Membrane impedance changes during synaptic transmission in cat spinal motoneurons.Journal of neurophysiology, 30 5
M. Bennett, Y. Nakajima, G. Pappas (1967)
Physiology and ultrastructure of electrotonic junctions. 3. Giant electromotor neurons of Malapterurus electricus.Journal of neurophysiology, 30 2
J. Coombs, J. Eccles, P. Fatt (1955)
Excitatory synaptic action in motoneuronesThe Journal of Physiology, 130
(1964)
Spinal and medullary nuclei controlling electric organ in the eel , Electrophorus
R. Thomas, V. Wilson (1966)
Marking Single Neurons by Staining with Intracellular Recording MicroelectrodesScience, 151
P. Nelson (1966)
Interaction between spinal motoneurons of the cat.Journal of neurophysiology, 29 2
(1966)
Distribution of synaptic inputs in the spinal motoneurone and its functional significance
J. Eccles (1964)
The Physiology of Synapses
M. Brightman, Th. Reese (1969)
JUNCTIONS BETWEEN INTIMATELY APPOSED CELL MEMBRANES IN THE VERTEBRATE BRAINThe Journal of Cell Biology, 40
J. Robertson (1961)
ULTRASTRUCTURE OF EXCITABLE MEMBRANES AND THE CRAYFISH MEDIAN‐GIANT SYNAPSEAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 94
M. Bennett, E. Aljure, Y. Nakajima, G. Pappas (1963)
Electrotonic Junctions between Teleost Spinal Neurons: Electrophysiology and UltrastructureScience, 141
A. Martin, G. Pilar (1963)
Dual mode of synaptic transmission in the avian ciliary ganglionThe Journal of Physiology, 168
C. Hinrichsen, L. Larramendi (1968)
Synapses and cluster formation of the mouse mesencephalic fifth nucleus.Brain research, 7 2
R. Eckert (1963)
Electrical Interaction of Paired Ganglion Cells in the LeechThe Journal of General Physiology, 46
Colin Hinrichsen, Colin Hinrichsen, Luis Larramendi, Luis Larramendi (1969)
Features of trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus structure and organization. I. Light microscopy.The American journal of anatomy, 126 4
M. Farquhar, G. Palade (1963)
JUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES IN VARIOUS EPITHELIAThe Journal of Cell Biology, 17
T. Araki, T. Ôtani (1955)
Response of single motoneurons to direct stimulation in toad's spinal cord.Journal of neurophysiology, 18 5
M. Bennett, G. Pappas, M. Giménez, Y. Nakajima (1967)
Physiology and ultrastructure of electrotonic junctions. IV. Medullary electromotor nuclei in gymnotid fish.Journal of neurophysiology, 30 2
M. Ito (1957)
The electrical activity of spinal ganglion cells investigated with intracellular microelectrodes.The Japanese journal of physiology, 7 4
E. Fadiga, J. Brookhart (1960)
Monosynaptic activation of different portions of the motor neuron membrane.The American journal of physiology, 198
M. Bennett, G. Pappas, E. Aljure, Y. Nakajima (1967)
Physiology and ultrastructure of electrotonic junctions. II. Spinal and medullary electromotor nuclei in mormyrid fish.Journal of neurophysiology, 30 2
B. Payton, M. Bennett, G. Pappas (1969)
Permeability and Structure of Junctional Membranes at an Electrotonic SynapseScience, 166
E. Furshpan, D. Potter (1959)
Transmission at the giant motor synapses of the crayfishThe Journal of Physiology, 145
(1968)
Central organization of the mesencephalic nucleus. Thesis
Robertson Jd (1963)
THE OCCURRENCE OF A SUBUNIT PATTERN IN THE UNIT MEMBRANES OF CLUB ENDINGS IN MAUTHNER CELL SYNAPSES IN GOLDFISH BRAINSThe Journal of Cell Biology, 19
Masao Ito, Masanobu Saiga (1959)
The mode of impulse conduction through the spinal ganglion.The Japanese journal of physiology, 9 1
(1969)
Electrophysiological characteristics of cat dorsal root
A. Watanabe, Harry Grundfest (1961)
Impulse Propagation at the Septal and Commissural Junctions of Crayfish Lateral Giant AxonsThe Journal of General Physiology, 45
M. Bennett (1966)
PHYSIOLOGY OF ELECTROTONIC JUNCTIONS *Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 137
A. Watanabe, T. Bullock (1960)
Modulation of Activity of One Neuron by Subthreshold Slow Potentials in Another in Lobster Cardiac GanglionThe Journal of General Physiology, 43
G. Svaetichin (1951)
Electrophysiological investigations on single ganglion cells.Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum, 24 86
E. Weinberg (1928)
The mesencephalic root of the fifth nerve. A comparative anatomical studyJournal of Comparative Neurology, 46
S. Hagiwara, H. Morita (1962)
Electrotonic transmission between two nerve cells in leech ganglion.Journal of neurophysiology, 25
G. Pappas, M. Bennett (1966)
SPECIALIZED JUNCTIONS INVOLVED IN ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION BETWEEN NEURONS. *Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 137
E. Furshpan (1964)
"Electrical Transmission" at an Excitatory Synapse in a Vertebrate BrainScience, 144
J. Simpson (1969)
THE RELEASE OF NEURAL TRANSMITTER SUBSTANCESJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 32
H. Davis (1926)
Conduction of the nerve impulse.Canadian Medical Association journal, 101 6
M. Bennett, Y. Nakajima, G. Pappas (1967)
Physiology and ultrastructure of electrotonic junctions. I. Supramedullary neurons.Journal of neurophysiology, 30 2
A. Grinnell (1966)
A study of the interaction between motoneurones in the frog spinal cordThe Journal of Physiology, 182
J. Szentágothai (1948)
Anatomical considerations on monosynaptic reflex arcs.Journal of neurophysiology, 11 5
Electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve evokes a ‘short latency depolarization’ (SLD) in the first order sensory neurones of the mesencephalic nucleus (MSN) of the Vth nerve in the rat. A series of experiments suggesting ‘electrotonic coupling’ as the mechanism for this SLD is provided. 1. Electrical activity of MSN neurones was recorded intracellularly as action potentials were conducted from the periphery (somatopetally) to the masticatory nucleus. Typical sequential invasion of the initial segment and somatic region (IS—S) of the neurones was seen. The somatopetal activation of MSN neurones was characterized by the brevity, short refractoriness, high safety factor (IS—S), and short after‐hyperpolarization of the spike potential. 2. In twenty‐three (10·5%) of the penetrated neurones, stimulation at levels subthreshold for somatopetal activation uncovered a SLD with a mean latency of 180 μsec. 3. The SLDs were found to be all‐or‐none in nature, and to have constant amplitude and latency for a given cell, plus a short half decay time. 4. Hyperpolarization of a MSN neurone through the recording electrode produced a blockage of the IS—S spike and revealed M‐spikes and SLDs which could be clearly separated, in every instance, as distinct all‐or‐none components. The amplitude of the SLD was found to be insensitive to the level of membrane potential within the ranges tested. 5. In fifteen neurones the SLD generated action potentials which were conducted somatofugally as shown by their collision with somatopetally conducted action potentials in the same cell. The lack of collision between the SLD and somatopetal spikes demonstrated the independent origin of these two potentials. 6. The independence of the SLD from the somatopetal invasion of the cell was also demonstrated by collision of a somatofugal action potential following direct stimulation through the recording micro‐electrode and a somatopetal spike following trigeminal stimulation. 7. Two possible mechanisms are considered for the genesis of the SLD: chemical synaptic transmission and electrotonic coupling between neighbouring cells. The conclusion is drawn that SLDs must be generated by the latter mechanism.
The Journal of Physiology – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1971
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.