Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Matthias Lang, C. Caves (2010)
Quantum discord and the geometry of Bell-diagonal states.Physical review letters, 105 15
M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, J. Cirac, P. Horodecki (2000)
Optimization of entanglement witnessesPhysical Review A, 62
L. Vandersypen, M. Steffen, G. Breyta, C. Yannoni, M. Sherwood, I. Chuang (2001)
Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonanceNature, 414
M. Wiesniak, V. Vedral, Č. Brukner (2005)
Magnetic susceptibility as a macroscopic entanglement witnessNew Journal of Physics, 7
F. Brandão, R. Vianna (2004)
Separable multipartite mixed states: operational asymptotically necessary and sufficient conditions.Physical review letters, 93 22
X. Fang, Xi-wen Zhu, M. Feng, Xi’an Mao, Fei Du (1999)
Experimental implementation of dense coding using nuclear magnetic resonancePhysical Review A, 61
(2008)
Sarthour a nd I
F. Brandão (2005)
Entanglement activation and the robustness of quantum correlationsPhysical Review A, 76
Nikolay Raychev, I. Chuang (2010)
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography
D. Cavalcanti (2006)
Connecting the generalized robustness and the geometric measure of entanglementPhysical Review A, 73
M. Steiner (2003)
Generalized robustness of entanglementPhysical Review A, 67
F. Brandão (2005)
Quantifying entanglement with witness operatorsPhysical Review A, 72
M. Nielsen, M. Nielsen, E. Knill, R. Laflamme (1998)
Complete quantum teleportation using nuclear magnetic resonanceNature, 396
C. Ramanathan, N. Boulant, Zhiying Chen, D. Cory, I. Chuang, M. Steffen (2004)
NMR Quantum Information ProcessingQuantum Information Processing, 3
R. Rahimi, K. Takeda, M. Ozawa, M. Kitagawa (2004)
Entanglement witness derived from NMR superdense codingJournal of Physics A, 39
T. Rappoport, L. Ghivelder, J. Fernandes, R. Guimarães, M. Continentino (2006)
Experimental observation of quantum entanglement in low-dimensional spin systemsPhysical Review B, 75
T. Maciel, A. Ces'ario, R. Vianna (2010)
VARIATIONAL QUANTUM TOMOGRAPHY WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION BY MEANS OF SEMIDEFINITE PROGRAMSInternational Journal of Modern Physics C, 22
M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang (2004)
Quantum Information and Quantum Computation
M. Kawamura, Benjamin Rowland, Jonathan Jones (2010)
Preparing pseudopure states with controlled-transfer gatesPhysical Review A, 82
A. Souza, M. Reis, D. Soares-Pinto, I. Oliveira, R. Sarthour (2007)
Experimental determination of thermal entanglement in spin clusters using magnetic susceptibility measurementsPhysical Review B, 77
G. Leskowitz, L. Mueller (2004)
State interrogation in nuclear magnetic resonance quantum-information processingPhysical Review A, 69
N. Khaneja, Timo Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, S. Glaser (2005)
Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms.Journal of magnetic resonance, 172 2
Gustavo Lima, E. G'omez, A. Vargas, A. Vargas, R. Vianna, Carlos Saavedra (2010)
Fast entanglement detection for unknown states of two spatial qutritsPhysical Review A, 82
Entanglement witnesses (EW) allow the detection of entanglement in a quantum system, from the measurement of some few observables. They do not require the complete determination of the quantum state, which is regarded as a main advantage. On this paper it is experimentally analyzed an entanglement witness recently proposed in the context of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance experiments to test it in some Bell-diagonal states. We also propose some optimal entanglement witness for Bell-diagonal states. The efficiency of the two types of EW’s are compared to a measure of entanglement with tomographic cost, the generalized robustness of entanglement. It is used a GRAPE algorithm to produce an entangled state which is out of the detection region of the EW for Bell-diagonal states. Upon relaxation, the results show that there is a region in which both EW fails, whereas the generalized robustness still shows entanglement, but with the entanglement witness proposed here with a better performance.
Quantum Information Processing – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 13, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.