Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/a-scenario-based-framework-for-multicriteria-decision-analysis-in-nonJ7CL0N4
References (11)
-
M. Gershon, L. Duckstein, R. McAniff (1982)
Multiobjective river basin planning with qualitative criteriaWater Resources Research, 18
-
P. Korhonen, J. Wallenius, Stanley Zionts (1984)
Solving the Discrete Multiple Criteria Problem using Convex ConesManagement Science, 30
-
J. Cohon, D. Marks (1975)
A review and evaluation of multiobjective programing techniquesWater Resources Research, 11
-
J. Cohon, D. Marks (1973)
Multiobjective screening models and water resource investmentWater Resources Research, 9
-
G. Miller (1956)
The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological review, 63 2
-
R. Laundy (1989)
Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and ApplicationJournal of the Operational Research Society, 39
-
D. Winterfeldt, W. Edwards (1986)
Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research -
S. French (1983)
Multi-Objective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business ApplicationsJournal of the Operational Research Society, 34
-
Stanley Zionts, J. Wallenius (1983)
An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility FunctionsManagement Science, 29
-
A. Wierzbicki (1979)
The Use of Reference Objectives in Multiobjective Optimization -
V. Belton, Stephen Vickers (1990)
Use of a Simple Multi-Attribute Value Function Incorporating Visual Interactive Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1995 by the American Geophysical Union.
- ISSN
- 0043-1397
- eISSN
- 1944-7973
- DOI
- 10.1029/95WR01901
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This paper describes the evolution of a general group decision‐making or negotiation support procedure for water resources planning at a strategic level (such as regional development planning), based on principles of multicriteria decision analysis. A number of difficulties have been encountered in applying many of the standard multiple‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) tools and techniques directly in this context. The paper introduces a broader framework in which these difficulties may be overcome, so that MCDM tools can be used effectively for evaluating strategic planning options. This framework is based on direct evaluation of sequences of “policy scenarios,” which are neither a full set of possible planning “alternatives,” nor fully specified down to the finest level of detail. The overall procedure and some experiences in applying it within the context of regional water resource planning in South Africa are discussed.
Journal
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 1995