Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Yampolsky, H. Yampolsky
Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora
A. Gilmartin (1968)
Baker's Law and Dioecism in the Hawaiian Flora: An Apparent Contradiction
K. Bawa, P. Opler (1975)
DIOECISM IN TROPICAL FOREST TREESEvolution, 29
E. Kleiner, K. Harper (1972)
Environment and Communiy Organization in Grasslands of Canyonlands National ParkEcology, 53
P. Ashton (1969)
Speciation among tropical forest trees: some deductions in the light of recent evidenceBiological Journal of The Linnean Society, 1
R. Steel, J. Torrie (1960)
Principles and procedures of statistics: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York Toronto London.
R. Ream (1964)
The vegetation of the Wasatch Mountains, Utah and Idaho
S. Carlquist (1966)
THE BIOTA OF LONG‐DISTANCE DISPERSAL. IV. GENETIC SYSTEMS IN THE FLORAS OF OCEANIC ISLANDSEvolution, 20
D. Freeman, L. Klikoff, K. Harper (1976)
Differential Resource Utilization by the Sexes of Dioecious PlantsScience, 193
F. David, R. Steel, J. Torrie (1961)
Principles and procedures of statistics.
D. Lewis (1942)
THE EVOLUTION OF SEX IN FLOWERING PLANTSBiological Reviews, 17
J. Warner, K. Harper (1972)
Understory characteristics related to site quality for aspen in Utah, 16
M. Westergaard (1958)
The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants.Advances in genetics, 9
P. Munz (1960)
A California Flora
V. Grant (1951)
The Fertilization of FlowersScientific American, 184
Baker Hg (1959)
Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 24
G. Stebbins (1951)
NATURAL SELECTION AND THE DIFFERENTIATION OF ANGIOSPERM FAMILIESEvolution, 5
E. Tisdale, J. Curtis (1960)
The Vegetation of WisconsinJournal of Wildlife Management, 26
K. Mather (1940)
Outbreeding and Separation of the SexesNature, 145
Data from 44 plant communities of the arid zone of western North America and from the entire California flora suggest that the dioecious habit (separate sexed individuals) is best developed among wind pollinated woody plants. A rationale is presented for the ways in which wind pollination and large plant size have favored the development of the dioecious habit. Based upon the patterns examined, it is concluded that inbreeding depression alone is insufficient to account for the evolution of the dioecious habit in many temperate species.
Oecologia – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 1, 1979
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.