Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Richard Roll (1977)
A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory''s Tests: Part I
Friend
Risk and Capital Asset PricingRodney L. White Center for Financial Research, University of Pennsylvania
M. Blume (1975)
BETAS AND THEIR REGRESSION TENDENCIESJournal of Finance, 30
R. Pettit, R. Westerfield (1974)
Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Market Model to Predict Security ReturnsJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9
E. Fama, James MacBeth (1973)
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical TestsJournal of Political Economy, 81
I. Friend, R. Westerfield, Michael Granito (1978)
New Evidence on the Capital Asset Pricing ModelJournal of Finance, 33
H. Levy (1978)
Equilibrium in an Imperfect Market: A Constraint on the Number of Securities in the PortfolioThe American Economic Review, 68
A. Kraus, R. Litzenberger (1976)
SKEWNESS PREFERENCE AND THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETSJournal of Finance, 31
Oldrich Vasicek (1973)
A NOTE ON USING CROSS‐SECTIONAL INFORMATION IN BAYESIAN ESTIMATION OF SECURITY BETASJournal of Finance, 28
John Bildersee (1975)
Some New Bond IndexesThe Journal of Business, 48
Co-Skewness and Capital Asset Pricing IRWIN FRIEND and RANDOLPH WESTERFIELD* I. Introduction VIRTUALLY OF THE early studies of the Sharpe-Lintner capital asset pricing ALL model (CAPM) found the predicted linear relationship between return and the non-diversifiable risk of risky assets, generally represented by common stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). However, they also found that this return-risk relationship seemed to imply for most periods a riskless market rate of return substantially above any reasonable measure of the actual risk-free rates of return. Recent papers point to a similar result if the market portfolio of risky assets is represented by an appropriately weighted portfolio of common stocks and bonds instead of common stocks alone.' Thus, it is noteworthy that a study by Kraus and Litzenberger finds that a measure of co-skewness can be used as a supplement to the co-variance measure of risk to explain the returns on individual NYSE stocks, and in the process to explain the otherwise observed discrepancies between these returns and the returns on NYSE stocks as a whole.2 In other words, they extend capital asset pricing theory to incorporate the effect of skewness in return distributions, making the assumption that investors
The Journal of Finance – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1980
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.