Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Pay Differentials by Size of Establishment

Pay Differentials by Size of Establishment Footnotes 1 The author wishes to acknowledge the aid of Daniel Rubinfeld in the collection and calculation of data. William G. Bowen offered helpful comments on an early version of this paper. It has also benefited from sugestions by the editor. 2 See also, the additional data on employee benefits in Richard A. Lester , “ Benefits as a Preferred Form of Worker Compensation ,” Southern Economic Journal , Vol. XXXIII ( April, 1967 ). 3 A list of the studies containing size‐of‐establishment statistics was provided the author by the BLS. 4 The other size categories vary from study to study and include the following: 8–20 employees, 8–50, 8–100, 8–250, 21–50, 21–100, 21–250, 51–100, 51–250, and 101–250. 5 Apparently influenced to some extent by degree of unionization. 6 In the textile and clothing industries the average hourly earnings for the smallest size category were about equal to the average in the largest size category. The special reasons for this lack of differential are explained below. 7 Man Hour Statistics for 171 Selected Industries, Census of Manufactures: 1939, Bureau of the Census (Washington, D.C.: 1942). 8 The 1963 figures have not been presented because they are annual wages per http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Industrial Relations Wiley

Pay Differentials by Size of Establishment

LESTER, RICHARD
Industrial Relations , Volume 7 (1) – Oct 1, 1967
Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/pay-differentials-by-size-of-establishment-nZnUZnRzKO

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0019-8676
eISSN
1468-232X
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-232X.1967.tb01063.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Footnotes 1 The author wishes to acknowledge the aid of Daniel Rubinfeld in the collection and calculation of data. William G. Bowen offered helpful comments on an early version of this paper. It has also benefited from sugestions by the editor. 2 See also, the additional data on employee benefits in Richard A. Lester , “ Benefits as a Preferred Form of Worker Compensation ,” Southern Economic Journal , Vol. XXXIII ( April, 1967 ). 3 A list of the studies containing size‐of‐establishment statistics was provided the author by the BLS. 4 The other size categories vary from study to study and include the following: 8–20 employees, 8–50, 8–100, 8–250, 21–50, 21–100, 21–250, 51–100, 51–250, and 101–250. 5 Apparently influenced to some extent by degree of unionization. 6 In the textile and clothing industries the average hourly earnings for the smallest size category were about equal to the average in the largest size category. The special reasons for this lack of differential are explained below. 7 Man Hour Statistics for 171 Selected Industries, Census of Manufactures: 1939, Bureau of the Census (Washington, D.C.: 1942). 8 The 1963 figures have not been presented because they are annual wages per

Journal

Industrial Relations – Wiley

Published: Oct 1, 1967

There are no references for this article.