Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2003)
The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Margins
A. Bennett (1872)
The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection; or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for LifeNature, 5
M. Araújo, A. Guisan (2006)
Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modellingJournal of Biogeography, 33
A. Guisan, W. Thuiller (2005)
Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models.Ecology letters, 8 9
C. Frost, S. Thompson (2000)
Correcting for regression dilution bias: comparison of methods for a single predictor variableJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 163
R. Heikkinen, M. Luoto, Raimo Virkkala, R. Pearson, J. Körber (2007)
Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro‐scalesGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 16
D. Purves, M. Zavala, K. Ogle, F. Prieto, J. Benayas (2007)
Environmental heterogeneity, bird-mediated directed dispersal, and oak woodland dynamics in Mediterranean SpainEcological Monographs, 77
M. Austin (2007)
Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approachesEcological Modelling, 200
Jorge Soberón, Miguel Nakamura (2009)
Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106
Hoon Kim (2000)
Monte Carlo Statistical MethodsTechnometrics, 42
S. Soubeyrand, S. Soubeyrand, S. Neuvonen, Antti Penttinen (2009)
Mechanical-Statistical Modeling in Ecology: From Outbreak Detections to Pest DynamicsBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 71
R. Heikkinen, M. Luoto, M. Araújo, Raimo Virkkala, W. Thuiller, M. Sykes (2006)
Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate changeProgress in Physical Geography, 30
Jorge Soberón (2007)
Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species.Ecology letters, 10 12
J. Lichstein, J. Dushoff, K. Ogle, Anping Chen, D. Purves, J. Caspersen, S. Pacala (2010)
Unlocking the forest inventory data: relating individual tree performance to unmeasured environmental factors.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 20 3
J. Elith, J. Leathwick (2010)
Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time
S. Loarie, P. Duffy, H. Hamilton, G. Asner, C. Field, D. Ackerly (2009)
The velocity of climate changeNature, 462
C. Beale, J. Lennon, A. Gimona (2008)
Opening the climate envelope reveals no macroscale associations with climate in European birdsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105
D. Baldocchi (2001)
The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial ComplexityAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 108
C. Thomas, A. Cameron, R. Green, R. Green, M. Bakkenes, L. Beaumont, Yvonne Collingham, B. Erasmus, Marinez Siqueira, A. Grainger, L. Hannah, L. Hughes, B. Huntley, A. Jaarsveld, G. Midgley, L. Miles, L. Miles, M. Ortega-Huerta, A. Peterson, O. Phillips, S. Williams (2004)
Extinction risk from climate changeNature, 427
N. Gotelli (2003)
Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale, 120
Clark Clark, Mohan Mohan, Dietze Dietze, Ibanez Ibanez (2003)
Coexistence: how to identify trophic cascadesEcology, 84
Martijn Gough (2009)
Climate changeCanadian Medical Association Journal, 181
S. Chib, E. Greenberg (1995)
Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings AlgorithmThe American Statistician, 49
G. Bohrnstedt, T. Carter (1971)
Robustness in Regression AnalysisSociological Methodology, 3
W. Houtcooper (1974)
Distribution and Abundance
M. Austin (2002)
Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modellingEcological Modelling, 157
M. Palmer, P. Dixon (1990)
Small-scale environmental heterogeneity and the analysis of species distributions along gradientsJournal of Vegetation Science, 1
M. A, R. I, P. M., A. Y, E. C, A N (2008)
Spatial scale affects bioclimate model projections of climate change impacts on mountain plants
D. Tilman, P. Kareiva (1997)
Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactionsEcology
J. Cabral, F. Schurr (2010)
Estimating demographic models for the range dynamics of plant speciesGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 19
C. Randin, Robin Engler, S. Normand, M. Zappa, N. Zimmermann, P. Pearman, P. Vittoz, W. Thuiller, A. Guisan (2009)
Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high‐elevation persistenceGlobal Change Biology, 15
D. Simberloff, E. Rapoport, Barbara Drausal (1983)
Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species
J. Grime (2009)
Climate Change and Vegetation
A. Hampe (2004)
Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hideGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 13
M. Ashcroft, L. Chisholm, K. French (2009)
Climate change at the landscape scale: predicting fine‐grained spatial heterogeneity in warming and potential refugia for vegetationGlobal Change Biology, 15
C. Daly, R. Neilson, D. Phillips (1994)
A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous TerrainJournal of Applied Meteorology, 33
A. Phillips, G. Smith (1991)
How independent are "independent" effects? Relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 44 11
Daniel Montoya, D. Purves, I. Urbieta, M. Zavala (2009)
Do Species Distribution Models explain spatial structure within tree species rangesGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 18
Morgane Barbet-Massin, W. Thuiller, F. Jiguet (2010)
How much do we overestimate future local extinction rates when restricting the range of occurrence data in climate suitability modelsEcography, 33
W. Thuiller, L. Brotóns, M. Araújo, S. Lavorel (2004)
Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributionsEcography, 27
Jeremy Thomas, R. Rose, R. Clarke, C. Thomas, N. Webb (1999)
Intraspecific variation in habitat availability among ectothermic animals near their climatic limits and their centres of rangeFunctional Ecology, 13
J. Clark, J. Mohan, M. Dietze, I. Ibáñez (2003)
COEXISTENCE: HOW TO IDENTIFY TROPHIC TRADE-OFFSEcology, 84
Daniel Chapman (2010)
Weak climatic associations among British plant distributions.Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19
J. Clark (2004)
Why environmental scientists are becoming BayesiansEcology Letters, 8
M. Araújo, C. Rahbek (2006)
How Does Climate Change Affect Biodiversity?Science, 313
J. Bartlett, B. Stavola, C. Frost (2009)
Linear mixed models for replication data to efficiently allow for covariate measurement errorStatistics in Medicine, 28
C. Darwin
The origin of species : by means natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life
Summary 1. Developing the next‐generation of species distribution modelling (SDM) requires solutions to a number of widely recognised problems. Here, we address the problem of uncertainty in predictor variables arising from fine‐scale environmental variation. 2. We explain how this uncertainty may cause scale‐dependent ‘regression dilution’, elsewhere a well‐understood statistical issue, and explain its consequences for SDM. We then demonstrate a simple, general correction for regression dilution based on Bayesian methods using latent variables. With this correction in place, unbiased estimates of species occupancy vs. the true environment can be retrieved from data on occupancy vs. measured environment, where measured environment is correlated with the true environment, but subject to substantial measurement error. 3. We then show how applying our correction to multiple co‐occurring species simultaneously increases the accuracy of parameter estimates for each species, as well as estimates for the true environment at each survey plot – a phenomenon we call ‘neighbourly advice’. With a sufficient number of species, the estimates of the true environment at each plot can become extremely accurate. 4. Our correction for regression dilution could be integrated with models addressing other issues in SDM, e.g. biotic interactions and/or spatial dynamics. We suggest that Bayesian analysis, as employed here to address uncertainty in predictor variables, might offer a flexible toolbox for developing such next‐generation species distribution models.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.