Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/effects-of-reinforcement-magnitude-on-choice-and-rate-of-responding-mykvoo3PSu
References (26)
-
R. Mckelvey (1956)
The relationship between training methods and reward variables in brightness discrimination learning.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 49 5
-
K. Clayton (1964)
T-MAZE CHOICE LEARNING AS A JOINT FUNCTION OF THE REWARD MAGNITUDES FOR THE ALTERNATIVES.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 58
-
Shin-Ho Chung, R. Herrnstein (1967)
Choice and delay of reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 10 1
-
A. Pereboom (1957)
An analysis and revision of Hull's theorem 30.Journal of experimental psychology, 53 4
-
(1967)
Choice and rate of responding in the pigeon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation -
R. Herrnstein (1964)
SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 7
-
R. Herrnstein (1961)
Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 4
-
S. Shettleworth, J. Nevin (1965)
RELATIVE RATE OF RESPONSE AND RELATIVE MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENT IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 8
-
E. Furchtgott, R. Rubin (1953)
The effect of magnitude of reward on maze learning in the white rat.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 46 1
-
J. Findley (1958)
Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1 2
-
L. Festinger (1943)
Development of differential appetite in the rat.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32
-
W. Jenkins, F. Clayton (1949)
Rate of responding and amount of reinforcement.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 42 3
-
D. Hendry (1962)
The effect of correlated amount of reward on performance on a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 55
-
R. Keesey, J. Kling (1961)
Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 4
-
McKelvey McKelvey (1956)
The relationship between training methods and reward variables in brightness discrimination learningJ. comp. physiol. Pyschol, 49
-
L. Crespi (1942)
Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat.American Journal of Psychology, 55
-
J. Davenport, K. Goodrich, W. Hagquist (1966)
Effects of magnitude of reinforcement in Macaca speciosaPsychonomic Science, 4
-
John Staddon, N. Innis (1966)
Preference for fixed vs. variable amounts of rewardPsychonomic Science, 4
-
D. Hendry, C. Van-Toller (1964)
PERFORMANCE ON A FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULE WITH CORRELATED AMOUNT OF REWARD.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 7
-
M. Denny, G. King (1955)
Differential response learning on the basis of differential size of reward.The Journal of genetic psychology, 87 2
-
A. Schrier (1962)
Response Latency of Monkeys as a Function of Reward Amount and Trials within Test DaysPsychological Reports, 10
-
A. Catania (1963)
Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 6
-
J. Kling (1956)
Speed of running as a function of goal-box behavior.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 49 5
-
A. Schrier (1958)
Comparison of two methods of investigating the effect of amount of reward on performance.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 51 6
-
Howard Rachlin (1967)
The effect of shock intensity on concurrent and single-key responding in concurrent-chain schedules.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 10 1
-
Jack Curtis, O. Mowrer (1960)
Learning Theory and Behavior, 21
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- 1967 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- ISSN
- 0022-5002
- eISSN
- 1938-3711
- DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-417
- pmid
- 6050053
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Behavior is sometimes insensitive, and sometimes extremely sensitive, to changes in reinforcement magnitude. The present work attempted to analyze this disparity by comparing, in a single experimental situation, a pigeon's choices with its response rates. Whereas choices varied directly with reinforcement duration, rates of responding were comparatively insensitive to duration changes. These results suggest that the effect of reinforcement magnitude on responding partly depends upon the extent to which responding influences the amount of reinforcement.
Journal
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1967